Search archived events

Lecture

Lecture 93 - Being in the room when it happens: women firsts in Westminster

Women who have entered British politics in the last few decades have been rightly celebrated, but how much do we know about those pioneers who came before? And how do we use their experiences to help the generations to come?

As we approach International Women's Day (8 March), in this lecture we will be introduced to some significant but little known women who came first in Westminster politics - from the first woman to cast a vote to women who are still fighting for acceptance today. We will also take time to reflect on how far we have come in achieving representation for over 50% of the population and how much farther we've yet to travel.

Video transcript

00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:38.000
And yes, let's do the poll, right, bear with me a second. So I'm going to try and find out sort of where you think we are in terms of our balance. So here are some questions to get you thinking about where we are now in terms of our equality across politics

00:00:38.000 --> 00:00:45.000
in the UK. So have a look and see what you think.

00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:54.000
And we'll see what the general consensus is the answers will come out during the course of the lecture.

00:00:54.000 --> 00:00:57.000
Let's give that little minute then Ali.

00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:26.000
Yeah, we'll just give people a little bit more time when got through everybody yet.

00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:31.000
Next we have ask them for questions. So I think it's gonna

00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:48.000
that we will give you all a little bit of time.

00:01:48.000 --> 00:01:57.000
really interesting.

00:01:57.000 --> 00:02:05.000
Right. I think that's kind of plateaued and I was told me to enter that.

00:02:05.000 --> 00:02:16.000
Yeah I think so I think most people who say, It's nuts the results there for everybody. A little recap before we press on.

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:20.000
Okay. Right. Shall we move on then Ali.

00:02:20.000 --> 00:02:23.000
That's great. Thank you. Thanks everybody.

00:02:23.000 --> 00:02:28.000
Let me stop sharing that, and take that off your screens. Okay.

00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:31.000
So do you want me to share the presentation though.

00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:32.000
Please, if you would.

00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:42.000
And we've had a few problems people sort of be me that yeah it's been it's been the reason for us lately lately, that we are with us.

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:46.000
Right. Okay, Let's share.

00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:51.000
Okay, we'll put the poll back up at the end when we come to the question I'm going to pose the end.

00:02:51.000 --> 00:03:12.000
For some people, and we'll I'm going to give you the answers as we talk. So, that's something. And I just wanted to start off with this quotation from Emily Pankhurst because it reflects some of the things that I think women have to stand against when

00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:18.000
we are exploring politics in it with the light with the capital P.

00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.000
in the.

00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:35.000
If a woman steps out of place. And very often they are regarded as militant or they are regarded as staring in some kind of way. The recent debate about the, the MP that decided to

00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:50.000
that she wants to do something about being a mother in Parliament and breastfed her child was that she was in some way content trying to make a point, and her response is very much well actually you know I just need to feed my child.

00:03:50.000 --> 00:04:09.000
And it's, it is this issue about militancy, but I'm going to focus on some women to that tonight that you may or may not be aware of. And you may not have heard of but who are, who represent some firsts within the Westminster bubble, as it were, and.

00:04:09.000 --> 00:04:11.000
Next slide please.

00:04:11.000 --> 00:04:15.000
Okay. One seconds hopefully this works.

00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:17.000
Fingers crossed.

00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:24.000
Sorry. Excuse us folks.

00:04:24.000 --> 00:04:30.000
I can't seem to move on the slide so here we are, hold on. Let's see if that works. there we go again.

00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:43.000
So I Chris movie the top being in the room where it happens, which is, which is a quote from Hamilton, where Aaron Berger talks about wanting to be the person who's in the room where it happens, because if you're in the room where it happens, you can

00:04:43.000 --> 00:04:58.000
dictate policy. If you're not in the room where it happens, then you can only speculate on what goes on in the rooms in the corridors of power. That's why that's the reason for the title, but let's start with the first with the first of our women, and

00:04:58.000 --> 00:05:11.000
perhaps in some ways the one that is the most extraordinary. So next slide please.

00:05:11.000 --> 00:05:35.000
So this is going to be Maxwell Maxwell was the first woman to cast a vote in an election in the UK in fact in the municipal election. And it happened in 1867 astonishingly early and it was a result of a, a clerical error.

00:05:35.000 --> 00:05:48.000
Lily Maxwell was a widow in her late 60s she originally from Scotland she worked in domestic service and most of her life and she'd managed to collect together enough money you know we're just to buy a shop.

00:05:48.000 --> 00:05:55.000
And the shop so across all crockery, and she owned the shop, which meant that she was a property owner.

00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.000
And that

00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:05.000
accidentally meant that she was liable to be able to have a vote in the local elections.

00:06:05.000 --> 00:06:11.000
And she was sent a voting card to do that.

00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:24.000
She was somebody who owned a house in place and culture children in med med lock which is in Manchester, where it was worth more than that which would give her the franchise.

00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:35.000
So, she received this card, she happened to mention this to, to some of the local canvases and they went oh no we really want to tell people about this.

00:06:35.000 --> 00:06:57.000
And the, the local MP for the Liberal Party at that point, and said, whenever you should you should actually do this, Jake bright, who was the liberal candidates gave him gave her support and supported by his wife, and another woman called Lydia Baker.

00:06:57.000 --> 00:07:01.000
They arranged for me to go to cast a vote.

00:07:01.000 --> 00:07:07.000
So Lily turns up with her card, and she goes to children Town Hall and she says, Look, I've got the card I can vote.

00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:24.000
And, and she had to do openly there was no secret, honestly, this time the reforms to voting hadn't yet happened. So she had to walk into this room, you know this this woman in her 60s to cast a vote in front of everybody.

00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:29.000
And, and make the point that she was entitled so to do.

00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:43.000
There were lots of people there there was she was escorted out of the building by what the local paper describes as a large number of persons, and other people were, were cheering you know she was entitled to vote so she voted.

00:07:43.000 --> 00:07:54.000
It was widely reported There's a wonderful article in New York she posted in time where they actually said, a woman actually voted.

00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:59.000
And it took a hostile view that she should have been prevented because she was a woman.

00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:08.000
Because you should have ignored her demand to vote, as you would have ignored the demand of a child or 10 years old.

00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:14.000
But she she she went, she went to cast a vote, and then shortly after that.

00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:23.000
They changed the law. The second Reform Act happened in August of 1867.

00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:33.000
And it changed the law, that it meant that it didn't matter how much he earned, or how much she owned as a woman she couldn't vote, and that would remain the case.

00:08:33.000 --> 00:08:44.000
Until, of course, the first changes in women's suffrage after the First World War. So it would be another 50 years before another another woman can have another go.

00:08:44.000 --> 00:08:51.000
A casting a vote. And next slide keys.

00:08:51.000 --> 00:08:54.000
This is one of those pop quiz questions.

00:08:54.000 --> 00:09:08.000
Who was the first female MP. Now, the next person I'm going to talk about is usually the person who is thought of as being the first MP, but actually the first female and he was elected in 1980 was Constance Markiewicz.

00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:11.000
But she didn't take her seat.

00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:14.000
she was in jail time.

00:09:14.000 --> 00:09:18.000
Following the East rising of 1916.

00:09:18.000 --> 00:09:25.000
She was a remarkable woman, incredibly brave incredibly driven.

00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:33.000
And she she she was, she was a Deb she was from a very high class society group.

00:09:33.000 --> 00:09:36.000
And she was.

00:09:36.000 --> 00:09:47.000
She and her family were quite political start with her parents, the gore boots were involved in Irish politics from a very, very early age.

00:09:47.000 --> 00:10:02.000
And they were there in the time of a very, the beginnings of islands most turbulent part of their history, and they were, they were to kind of raised on stories of the family.

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:05.000
And

00:10:05.000 --> 00:10:21.000
it wasn't really until Constance moved to London, and she went to the slave School of Art, and then she got married, and that she started to become interested in politics and started by being involved in women's suffrage, and she doing the women's suffrage

00:10:21.000 --> 00:10:35.000
society in 1892, but it was the Irish cause that really caught her attention, so that when they, their family settled back in Dublin, and at the turn of the 20th century chatter young daughter at the time as well.

00:10:35.000 --> 00:10:44.000
She had a young daughter at the time as well. She joined the shin. She joined us in fame, she doing the two daughters of Ireland in 1998.

00:10:44.000 --> 00:11:01.000
And she developed strong bonds with the whole group and she became one of the leaders, and she was once asked by somebody if if they wanted to become involved in politics if a woman wants to become involved in politics which they do.

00:11:01.000 --> 00:11:06.000
And she is alleged to replied, sell your jewels and buy a gun.

00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:18.000
And certainly, she was not against the idea of violence to get her and, and she did take an active part in the, the action.

00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:29.000
The military action I suppose, of the East arising in 1960, and she was arrested along with all the other leaders and taken to come in jail.

00:11:29.000 --> 00:11:40.000
That because she was a woman. She was imprisoned, rather than short, and she was appalled. She wants to be treated exactly the same.

00:11:40.000 --> 00:11:51.000
And it, they kind of left her free to fight another day. So she was one of the supporters of one of the remaining

00:11:51.000 --> 00:12:11.000
people who were in charge on that day of angel of era, to help him start to create the independent island that the surprising really began with, but she's in subsequently She.

00:12:11.000 --> 00:12:23.000
other. I believe it was 49. Other Irish Republicans who got a seat in the 19 parliament, she refused to take a seat. And she was actually in back in jail in California.

00:12:23.000 --> 00:12:25.000
At the time, and she should have done.

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:31.000
So she never actually took us even though she was the first elected female MP.

00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:33.000
Next slide please.

00:12:33.000 --> 00:12:43.000
Now, the next lady is the one who is normally thought of as being the first female empty. This is the amazing Nancy Astor.

00:12:43.000 --> 00:12:47.000
Now, Nancy Astor was, she was.

00:12:47.000 --> 00:12:55.000
She was one of those American Debs that came over to Britain, looking for her husband.

00:12:55.000 --> 00:13:09.000
And she be she had she been married before, which was one of the reasons that she needed to to come to England to look for a second husband, my first husband, interestingly enough, you know, one of the side lights of history was Robert Gould Shaw the

00:13:09.000 --> 00:13:24.000
second, who was the son of the Robert Gould Shaw, who features in the film glory as the white commanding officer of the first black regiment in the American Civil War.

00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:31.000
Two there is this history of of changing society within her family.

00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:33.000
And they had a son.

00:13:33.000 --> 00:13:47.000
They had a son. Robert Gould Shaw, a third of the the marriages are happy and they divorced in 1903, so she moved to England in the hope that she might be able to to become more settled there.

00:13:47.000 --> 00:14:03.000
And moving in between then she starts moving in very stochastic circles, and she very quickly met and fell in love with Waldorf Astor, and they were married within six months of their first meeting.

00:14:03.000 --> 00:14:08.000
They became very involved in politics and we're very much part of the lead and set.

00:14:08.000 --> 00:14:16.000
And she became the prominent hostess, and she assisted in.

00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:34.000
In her husband's a lectionary for to become MP for Plymouth, however, Ward or faster was descended an aristocrat, and when his father died and he attained title he moved up to the House of Lords, leaving a vacant seat and Nancy decided that she would

00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:43.000
run for the post of MP for Plymouth, because she had her own views about this.

00:14:43.000 --> 00:14:56.000
She was allegedly at her best during the next electioneering. She had natural wit and charm she was quick off the off the mark in terms of being able to respond to hecklers.

00:14:56.000 --> 00:14:58.000
She.

00:14:58.000 --> 00:15:10.000
She always was interested in focusing on the poor and women and children, but she also had one or two other hang ups of her own. She was a very very strong campaign against alcohol.

00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:19.000
She thought that prohibition should be brought in, in, in England, as it had been in America.

00:15:19.000 --> 00:15:24.000
And she wasn't always as a cute about current political issues.

00:15:24.000 --> 00:15:39.000
So she wasn't always quite on top of things in terms of what the main discussions were tendency was to be very parochial and be concerned with the needs of the people within her.

00:15:39.000 --> 00:15:48.000
We didn't have patch, rather than to actually take on national politics in that sense.

00:15:48.000 --> 00:15:50.000
But she did win the election.

00:15:50.000 --> 00:16:01.000
and with quite a large, a large majority, and it was very interesting that at this point Plymouth had a large number of women voters.

00:16:01.000 --> 00:16:08.000
And the person she defeated was Michael foots father Isaac.

00:16:08.000 --> 00:16:29.000
And she campaigned to raise the voting age for women to 21 that was raised that was passed in 1928. She was responsible she put a private member's bill to raise the salary of alcohol for people to the age of 18 the law that still stands in place now.

00:16:29.000 --> 00:16:32.000
And that was passed in 1923.

00:16:32.000 --> 00:16:37.000
And she spent almost two years being the only woman in Parliament.

00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:40.000
And she.

00:16:40.000 --> 00:16:51.000
She admitted in later life that this was exceptionally difficult because there was no capacity for women, you know they hadn't even thought about things like female toilets.

00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:55.000
And this is an agent much more modest than our own.

00:16:55.000 --> 00:17:12.000
But she can work tirelessly during that time to include other women and P she welcomes new women and pieces they started to come into the house of commons. And she worked very hard as well to recruit women into the civil service into the police force,

00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:27.000
and she end also to try and balance things in the House of Lords and she was the MP for Plymouth and settle for 26 years until she decided to be 1945 election when it was advice that she shouldn't stand.

00:17:27.000 --> 00:17:35.000
She is of course most well known for her and her spats with Churchill who really disliked her, and she disliked him.

00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:40.000
And, and I'm sure that some of you have heard many of the quotes.

00:17:40.000 --> 00:17:50.000
And my favourite Nancy has to quote though is and I married beneath me all women do.

00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:54.000
Next slide please.

00:17:54.000 --> 00:18:08.000
So this is Margaret Bondfield she was the first women cabinet minister. She was the Minister of Labour. In 1929, so we're talking about you know really quite early on, and she would be one of those early women that would have been welcomed by Nancy

00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:12.000
Astor. At the beginning of her career.

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:15.000
And she was born in charge in Somerset.

00:18:15.000 --> 00:18:38.000
And this statue that you can see in the energy is actually in charge itself celebrating her, and she grew up in a family, who were very interested in social justice, particularly motivated by the fact that her father, who would be in a nice maker, and

00:18:38.000 --> 00:18:48.000
a foreman was sacked from his job. Even though there was no reason for it they just they just didn't want him anymore he'd been there too long, and they were having to pay more.

00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:52.000
And it happened when she was a child, affected the whole family.

00:18:52.000 --> 00:18:56.000
There were five children in the family.

00:18:56.000 --> 00:19:01.000
And she, she found it very difficult.

00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:16.000
But she was bright student, and she was very interested in, in what was going on and she was encouraged to debate at her school and at 14. However, she was sent off to work.

00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:20.000
And she got a job

00:19:20.000 --> 00:19:26.000
in in Brighton, working at a Draper shop.

00:19:26.000 --> 00:19:36.000
And it would be several years that she left that she before she saw her family again she was, was the treatment she received the Draper's in Brighton there's not bad.

00:19:36.000 --> 00:19:41.000
She became aware of exactly how difficult this particular role was for women.

00:19:41.000 --> 00:19:54.000
At this point, if you were a shop assistant, then you were expected to live in that you would expect to be on call whenever there was a customer handy.

00:19:54.000 --> 00:20:06.000
And that you were also responsible for things like cleaning and so on. And you were given very little time off, was usually sort of one afternoon a week in the morning to go to church on a Sunday, which of course was the reason that she didn't get to

00:20:06.000 --> 00:20:17.000
see a family because the family being in Somerset and she being in Brighton and afternoon off was not going to be able to get her home and back in order to see her family.

00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:27.000
She really really began to see how the daily grind of what was going on with white was it was kind of pushing these women down, lots of women that she met with just desperate to get married.

00:20:27.000 --> 00:20:42.000
There's one way out of working in the shop that they had, because they couldn't work in shop when once you were married, and it you know they would have accepted anything, and they have no opportunity, no time or energy to pursue any other interests outside

00:20:42.000 --> 00:20:56.000
outside work. So, you know, organizations like the WPA, which would have been available to these women in order to improve their education. They couldn't take it up, they didn't have time, they didn't have the energy.

00:20:56.000 --> 00:21:19.000
And so she, She started to become involved with a woman called Louise Martin go, and between them. And she moved to London, and they set up what became the shop assistant union District Council, and she was subsequently asked to to investigate the conditions

00:21:19.000 --> 00:21:21.000
under which these women working.

00:21:21.000 --> 00:21:30.000
So at the age of 25 she became the expert on the position of women who working in the drapery trade.

00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:48.000
And by the age of 30 she was presenting her findings on parliamentary committees, she was extremely well known in that field. And eventually, somebody said, like you know if you're doing all this work you ought to be thinking about, considering becoming

00:21:48.000 --> 00:22:06.000
an MP, she resisted it for quite a long time because she was so very much involved in developing organizations like the willing to lay lay the league.

00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:13.000
And then she was also the chair of the adult suffrage society because she believed in that that everybody should have a vote.

00:22:13.000 --> 00:22:35.000
So eventually it she was persuaded to stand as a labour candidate for Northampton, and after three attempts, she got her got this post as MP for Northampton, in 1923, which meant that she became as I said she became one of these first female in peace

00:22:35.000 --> 00:22:45.000
that Welcome binance Yes, even though she was on the other side of the house, and she continued to campaign for the rights of all women

00:22:45.000 --> 00:23:02.000
in 1924, very shortly after she arrived in in Parliament, and she became she was appointed a Secretary to the Minister for labor by Stanley Baldwin, after following the resignation of bond in law.

00:23:02.000 --> 00:23:08.000
And it was very short lived because she then subsequently lost her seat in, in 1931.

00:23:08.000 --> 00:23:20.000
But when she regained her seat in 1929 Ramsey McDonald then made her Minister for labour, which was the first time that a woman had been made a British cabinet minister.

00:23:20.000 --> 00:23:39.000
And it was on the put on the back of all this experience she had turned investigating the lives and working practices of women in, in, in the draping trade, because she also found out a great deal about the way that working conditions work for an awful

00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:42.000
lot of other organizations in that process.

00:23:42.000 --> 00:23:47.000
She was unfortunate. In that the timing was bad.

00:23:47.000 --> 00:23:58.000
And when it came to the next election in 1931. She lost her seat, because she had been a very unpopular Minister for labour.

00:23:58.000 --> 00:24:13.000
Because in being Minister for labour in the period between 1921 and 1939 meant that she was trying to be a minister for labour. During the Great for the beginning of the Great Depression.

00:24:13.000 --> 00:24:28.000
And she was having to take some difficult decisions in order to try and keep the labour force of flight, one of which was that she had a ruling where certain married women whose husbands were any certain amounts of money.

00:24:28.000 --> 00:24:32.000
We're going to have

00:24:32.000 --> 00:24:35.000
their benefits. Cut.

00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:50.000
This was extremely unpopular and standard Lee and Margaret got blamed for it. And it meant that she lost her seat, and she never re entered politics, partly because she then suffered ill health.

00:24:50.000 --> 00:24:58.000
And while she, she lived on for a good few more years after that. She never took part in any other policy politicking again.

00:24:58.000 --> 00:25:12.000
And it seems a shame to have lost somebody who was so, so very involved in so very true. So very committed to the rights of the working poor and. Next slide please.

00:25:12.000 --> 00:25:17.000
And this is how you say to who was the first female whip and she was MP for Stoke on Trent.

00:25:17.000 --> 00:25:34.000
And she was MP for Stoke on Trent. She was appointed in 1953, she was, she started out as a teacher, she trained at Hanley High School, and to treat Teacher Training College.

00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:39.000
So those of you in the middle man since this is our Black Country representative.

00:25:39.000 --> 00:25:55.000
And she was a national organizer for the CO operative society and that's how she started becoming involved in in politics, and she was very involved with them to the point that to this day, they hold a hurry at slate and Memorial Lecture.

00:25:55.000 --> 00:26:03.000
In July, in her name and where they are consider social issues.

00:26:03.000 --> 00:26:16.000
And her hope political focus was very much on the idea of supporting women, because by this time by the time we get to 1953.

00:26:16.000 --> 00:26:26.000
Women are very much part of the workforce, but they are not equally paid. They are not equally treated there are still some issues with not being able to work after you're married.

00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:36.000
She was appointed in a by election that she then stayed as the MP for Stoke on Trent until 1966.

00:26:36.000 --> 00:26:52.000
And in the latter stages of her life 1964 she was a government with, with the formal title of Lord and Treasury, and she's the first woman to actually hold that post and to be responsible for looking after the party and making sure that everybody was

00:26:52.000 --> 00:26:55.000
doing exactly as they should be.

00:26:55.000 --> 00:27:00.000
Um. Next slide please.

00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:17.000
And many of you will know this lady and she's Betty Boothroyd.

00:27:17.000 --> 00:27:29.000
People were taken on at the gates, as it were, in the same way as the doctors were taken on for the day so it meant that things were really really unbalanced.

00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:34.000
So, Betty was sent out to work as soon as she ever could.

00:27:34.000 --> 00:27:43.000
She started out as a shop assistant she learned type. And then at the age of 1617. She famously joined the tiller girls.

00:27:43.000 --> 00:27:57.000
And she unfortunately has a very short period in her life, because while she was performing at the London Palladium, and she stood on a nail and got a foot infection.

00:27:57.000 --> 00:28:06.000
And that meant that she was active again because she will recovery time was much longer than they were willing to keep her place open.

00:28:06.000 --> 00:28:21.000
So she then started working for a variety of MPs as an assistant, and she worked for example for Barbara Castle, who did something to encourage her ambitions to be in politics.

00:28:21.000 --> 00:28:32.000
She worked for two years in America, she where she was part of the campaign to nominate and subsequently elect and JFK.

00:28:32.000 --> 00:28:41.000
And she served as an assistant to one of the US representatives, until she returned to India in 1962.

00:28:41.000 --> 00:28:49.000
She then went back to working for a number of MPs, She contested a seat on Hammersmith her Council.

00:28:49.000 --> 00:29:01.000
And then eventually, after various attempts to get into. into parliament. She was appointed as the labour candidate for West Bromwich in 1973.

00:29:01.000 --> 00:29:11.000
In 1974 she followed and preview previous ladies ambitions by becoming a wit.

00:29:11.000 --> 00:29:19.000
And she was appointed to a number of select committees, including the Committee on Foreign Affairs.

00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:32.000
She was also on the speakers panel, and she retained that position until 1987 when she was appointed to the speaker is assistant speaker of the house.

00:29:32.000 --> 00:29:38.000
When the weather all the vent Speaker of the House stepped down in 1992.

00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:56.000
Betsy Boothroyd was elected to his, his post, but it was contested by an MP, my uncle john Brooke. So it was put to the vote and Betty got an overwhelming majority of the members of parliament in the House of Commons, to become the first Female Speaker

00:29:56.000 --> 00:29:57.000
of the House.

00:29:57.000 --> 00:30:12.000
She went a long way to trying to break down some of the traditional roles as the speaker, refusing for example to wear that traditional week she was quite happy to wear the robe, that she didn't want to whether we use it for the head, and she would finish

00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:18.000
quite right and bonus question, the question time with her own inimitable styles i right times up.

00:30:18.000 --> 00:30:37.000
And she was, she was, you know, known to be a firm speaker, which was exactly what was needed that she was sometimes a little bit irreverent towards the the the pomposity that she experienced, and eventually she retired from being speaker in 2000, and

00:30:37.000 --> 00:30:41.000
it's now a member of the House of Lords.

00:30:41.000 --> 00:30:58.000
And you may remember that there was a bit of a scandal about Betty Boothroyd that they were trying to suggest that she had in some ways, been involved in some kind of sexual impropriety.

00:30:58.000 --> 00:31:07.000
It turned out that what it happened was that she'd actually missed a training session on sex on safeguarding.

00:31:07.000 --> 00:31:22.000
And it just just because she'd been too busy, and that you do kind of gone down as a black mark on her record. And at the time, people were looking for really for a reason to, to find her through, she published her autobiography into the 2001.

00:31:22.000 --> 00:31:28.000
And if you're into lively anecdote then it's not a bad read.

00:31:28.000 --> 00:31:30.000
Next slide please.

00:31:30.000 --> 00:31:35.000
Now there are a range of women that I could have talked about and I chose not to.

00:31:35.000 --> 00:31:51.000
But these are some other names that you might know, and who are all very important to the way that politics and women in politics have developed, Barbara cast and of course being one of the most significant to remarkable and probably deserves a tool called

00:31:51.000 --> 00:32:00.000
so surely Williams and be paying 10 minutes. Garrett force it of course you start you know standing Westminster square.

00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:13.000
The amazing an extraordinary Mary Washington. And of course we cannot forget our first woman Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and not the first in the world, but our first.

00:32:13.000 --> 00:32:15.000
Next slide please.

00:32:15.000 --> 00:32:26.000
Some conscious of time. So, this is, this is where we start answering the questions that that we get from the beginning so here is the current state of affairs with the number of seats.

00:32:26.000 --> 00:32:43.000
When by women in the different in the different houses that exist within. Great Britain's politics will leave you with that for a second

00:32:43.000 --> 00:32:57.000
of the hundred and 40 MPs elected for the first time in 2019 41% were women.

00:32:57.000 --> 00:33:14.000
and the House of Lords has almost the same equivalent of a female peers, 223, but they represent a much smaller proportion. So there are 709 789.

00:33:14.000 --> 00:33:26.000
Members of the House floored with only 200 223 of them the female.

00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:38.000
The whilst, more than half our current MPs belong to the Conservative Party, and they have the lowest number of female MPs within that group.

00:33:38.000 --> 00:33:43.000
24% of their MPs,

00:33:43.000 --> 00:33:57.000
and Labour has always traditionally had the largest number.

00:33:57.000 --> 00:34:10.000
any nonsense. One of the other questions. It wasn't until 1987 that women first exceeded 5% of the MPs that was sitting in Parliament.

00:34:10.000 --> 00:34:15.000
Can I the next slide piece.

00:34:15.000 --> 00:34:24.000
So, I didn't forget local politics. So these are the numbers of women councillors across the country.

00:34:24.000 --> 00:34:35.000
And I find it particularly interesting that the elected members, and the metro Metropolitan mess so people you know like Manchester candy the.

00:34:35.000 --> 00:34:46.000
All of the men, and only four of the elective mares across England and Wales are women at the 16.

00:34:46.000 --> 00:34:54.000
So there's still a lot of work to be done, local politics level and of course that may well be the reason why things are a bit slower, the top of the tree.

00:34:54.000 --> 00:35:10.000
Because, as you've seen from some of the women that I've been talking about their first experiences were in local politics, and they've had the experience of being able to make a difference, locally and then they think about moving on to the next level.

00:35:10.000 --> 00:35:13.000
When the numbers are so low.

00:35:13.000 --> 00:35:28.000
Then, you know you can understand why that might be a challenge, and one in five council needs is being women, that's, That's disturbing statistic.

00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:32.000
We see the next slide please.

00:35:32.000 --> 00:35:40.000
So just to kind of give you a picture, across this is across the world. So at the moment.

00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:51.000
This is based on you and data, and the women in executive government decision so women is heads of state across the countries at the rate we're currently get going.

00:35:51.000 --> 00:36:03.000
It's going to be 130 years before heads of states have parity in gender politics across the world.

00:36:03.000 --> 00:36:20.000
And in terms of the women in cabinets. We have an annual increase of point five to a percentage point to get gender parity, we won't get that until 2077.

00:36:20.000 --> 00:36:24.000
Next slide please.

00:36:24.000 --> 00:36:38.000
So, one of my other questions was, which which country has the largest number of female on it sure wonder astonishing enough which has had more than half over 60% of its employees or female.

00:36:38.000 --> 00:36:41.000
And Jeff Japan likes well behind.

00:36:41.000 --> 00:36:56.000
You can see we're not doing so badly. But there are other countries that are doing better than we're.

00:36:56.000 --> 00:37:03.000
And next, and I think last slide.

00:37:03.000 --> 00:37:19.000
So, I'm going to leave you with a question for us to discuss with our remaining time together is, in your opinion, and I've got a nice big group of people to ask is What do you think is the one change that needs to happen by 2028, to really get women's

00:37:19.000 --> 00:37:27.000
representation. Up in the UK, or maybe internationally. I'm mostly interested in the UK but I'm quite happy.

00:37:27.000 --> 00:37:32.000
If anybody's got an international solutions to step forward.

00:37:32.000 --> 00:37:40.000
And that's the question I'm posing for you, and Fiona there was some people I believe who said that they wanted to have another look at their poll result what results.

00:37:40.000 --> 00:37:46.000
Yeah, to put those up can do not right this second but we've okay.

00:37:46.000 --> 00:37:52.000
There was one more thing. Yeah. Um, so those of you who are really interested.

00:37:52.000 --> 00:37:55.000
And there is.

00:37:55.000 --> 00:37:58.000
Do you want to put that slide up.

00:37:58.000 --> 00:38:01.000
Oh sorry there's my courses I forgotten about this.

00:38:01.000 --> 00:38:18.000
Thank you interested in hearing me talk about other things. As you can see I have a wide range of interests, so I just started this week, a series of talks and interviews, I try and be interactive with this on Hamlet.

00:38:18.000 --> 00:38:22.000
And so it's only the only starts this week so.

00:38:22.000 --> 00:38:26.000
And we don't have a session next week so if you want to catch up there's still time.

00:38:26.000 --> 00:38:40.000
I'm doing history of musical theatre, both in the future and on film, which starts in April. And I'm doing history of the life and times of Alexi Sawyer, who was a Victorian celebrity chef.

00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:50.000
And I'm doing some other in person courses in Salisbury and Warminster Dempster over the next few, few weeks.

00:38:50.000 --> 00:39:08.000
But if you are interested in finding out more about the situation with women in politics in the UK, and they are British Council produced a report, which was based on the position we were in 100 years after winning one the vote so it was published in

00:39:08.000 --> 00:39:17.000
1980, in 1980, in 2018, but it's still very relevant and it's an interesting read this is the link to it.

00:39:17.000 --> 00:39:27.000
If anybody is interested in finding out a little bit more about it and some of the statistics that I've got were taken from that particular document.

00:39:27.000 --> 00:39:36.000
Yeah. The link to this is posted up and alongside the recording of the lecture on the members area of the website once it's really, so.

00:39:36.000 --> 00:39:47.000
Okay, I'm going to stop shooting no alley. Brilliant. Thank you very much for helping out with that. Yeah.

00:39:47.000 --> 00:40:03.000
Right. Okay, now let me get back to my chats and get that open. And what we'll do is we'll put the best thing is to kind of have a mix of questions that people have asked, and then I can read out some of the comments that people have said, and in relation

00:40:03.000 --> 00:40:08.000
to the question that yeah that'd be lovely Thank you. I'm really interested in what people think.

00:40:08.000 --> 00:40:12.000
Right. Okay, let me go forward bear with me people.

00:40:12.000 --> 00:40:14.000
Right.

00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:18.000
Right. This is a question, and from Louisa.

00:40:18.000 --> 00:40:28.000
She thought that single female rip peers but able to vote and municipal elections from 1869 onwards.

00:40:28.000 --> 00:40:40.000
Yeah, there was a period, there was a period when they were at that loophole was closed by the format.

00:40:40.000 --> 00:40:51.000
And so that even though they were ratepayers, you had to have you had to have a man on the documents for the rate pain would be able to do that.

00:40:51.000 --> 00:41:06.000
It was one of those things that that time that tail end of the Victorian period. There was an awful lot of acts that were passed against women having control over their own destinies.

00:41:06.000 --> 00:41:19.000
And the voting was part of that, I mean things like the divorce laws were being investigated then the, the law about who was responsible for children.

00:41:19.000 --> 00:41:34.000
That was all involved in that as well. So that was, that was part of that difficult period, and Lily Maxwell story is it is it is an interesting one because what she did was she kind of slid under the wire.

00:41:34.000 --> 00:41:36.000
They actually passed the law.

00:41:36.000 --> 00:41:45.000
At the time she voted that they had said within the law that they were going to let the current situation stand until the end of the year.

00:41:45.000 --> 00:41:53.000
And she happened in she just happened to get there before the end of the year.

00:41:53.000 --> 00:41:59.000
Right, what we got. Next question from Anne Marie.

00:41:59.000 --> 00:42:17.000
What we're books is grounds for the pausing the election of, Betty Boothroyd speaker of the host, because she was a woman that we've never had a Female Speaker, and he john Brooks felt that a woman couldn't control the house of parliament, because anybody

00:42:17.000 --> 00:42:25.000
who's ever watched Parliament life will know that it's a pretty rough and ready face, and he believed that a woman wouldn't be able to do that.

00:42:25.000 --> 00:42:31.000
And one of the things he said was he thought she would cry.

00:42:31.000 --> 00:42:34.000
Which sounds absurd, particularly if you ever heard.

00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:54.000
Mrs Boothroyd in action or lady Boothroyd does she know it's, but certainly that was one of his reasons. He was she was too delicate a person to be able to, to, to stand the rough and tumble of being speaker and really turned out that we did not at all.

00:42:54.000 --> 00:42:56.000
Yeah.

00:42:56.000 --> 00:42:59.000
Another question from Ana.

00:42:59.000 --> 00:43:06.000
Why do you think that the conservatives have had to female pm.

00:43:06.000 --> 00:43:11.000
But labour hasn't even had a female leader.

00:43:11.000 --> 00:43:15.000
Well, I think.

00:43:15.000 --> 00:43:31.000
I think part of that is, is of course is that, Margaret Thatcher was remarkably politician of our own of her own right and I think one of the difficult things for those of us who are interested in this is the fact that she, she was actually not great

00:43:31.000 --> 00:43:43.000
for other women in her role she didn't bring other women own you know she had an opportunity perhaps to, to bring women into a cabinet and her cabinet were all male, she appointed men.

00:43:43.000 --> 00:44:02.000
So she didn't she didn't actually do much for improving things. And of course, Theresa May kind of got in on a technicality as it were, and subsequently lost her seed, why they have never actually managed it I'm not entirely sure I think it's, I think

00:44:02.000 --> 00:44:05.000
it may well be the collision of history.

00:44:05.000 --> 00:44:19.000
You know they they've, they've struggled in recently in recent years, to have any strong leadership, and they've not actually look to the women in their party to to do the business.

00:44:19.000 --> 00:44:28.000
I think they, they, they've, they've struggled in all kinds of ways to get the answer that they need, and then perhaps haven't looked at their female employees.

00:44:28.000 --> 00:44:31.000
I think there are women coming through.

00:44:31.000 --> 00:44:39.000
I think it won't be very long before we see our first labor female prime minister because I think they are there.

00:44:39.000 --> 00:44:48.000
And there's there's certainly some very strongly minded women coming through, and it will be very interesting to see how that develops over the next few years.

00:44:48.000 --> 00:45:06.000
And we've got quite a few comments, and answers and lovely. So on your question I'll read some of them, and Julie saying social attitudes towards women need to change first and then then she needs to be addressed by weight of society before things will

00:45:06.000 --> 00:45:07.000
And familia need to close the men on the public schools to get a change in politics parliament. That's an interesting one Parliament's more like the eastern debating society scoring points, then discussing serious issues.

00:45:07.000 --> 00:45:21.000
Yep.

00:45:21.000 --> 00:45:32.000
And from Jenny, and to get more women involved we need to change the culture, move towards grown ups, collaborating rather than play and petty point scoring.

00:45:32.000 --> 00:45:44.000
Yeah, that's true. there's there's also quite a lot of debate debate, and the parliamentary system we have the first past the post system doesn't favour and minorities of any kind.

00:45:44.000 --> 00:45:59.000
Both women, and, of course, ethnic, and ethnic minorities disabled minorities LGBT to know all of those kinds of minorities are not served by the current part first pass the new system that we have.

00:45:59.000 --> 00:46:09.000
And of course in Scotland, we have a different system with Yes, a proportional representation or system, which, yes.

00:46:09.000 --> 00:46:23.000
Well, more representative. So, okay, from Miranda. I think we need to get girls interested from a very early age that ambitions are already stifled in primary school.

00:46:23.000 --> 00:46:41.000
That's interesting. You know, I can see why, why, why that happens in it. there's, there's a socialization, I think, as well, you know, there's the there's things going on, you know, a woman who is outspoken is often referred is often regarded as aggressive,

00:46:41.000 --> 00:46:54.000
where a man might be described as assertive, and that's when you, when you when your rule is that you've got, you know, in order to make progress in in the political arena.

00:46:54.000 --> 00:47:00.000
That is that you've got to be aggressive you've got to be a bit tough, you've got to be an unspoken.

00:47:00.000 --> 00:47:10.000
And then, I think it's very difficult for women to overcome, you know for girls to overcome that, to go out and that's not how I want to be labelled.

00:47:10.000 --> 00:47:20.000
You know we have very good examples of women who are willing to do that, but they are also, you know, they feel that like they're in the minority.

00:47:20.000 --> 00:47:33.000
And it's more comments about actually you know the timing of business within the House of Commons being in issues well terms of, you know, it's not an on a nine to five basis, like another job might be.

00:47:33.000 --> 00:47:48.000
Yeah, you know, healthcare provision for women, you know, the timings of meetings, there's a lot of business that goes on evenings which might not necessarily be conducive to women who have children, that kind of thing.

00:47:48.000 --> 00:47:53.000
I mean, there has been there have been attempts to change there's no longer all night sittings.

00:47:53.000 --> 00:48:03.000
For example, which would, which, you know, made life impossible for women, but they also do need there is also a need to look at the provision of child care.

00:48:03.000 --> 00:48:13.000
I mean that was one of the issues about the MP within the breastfeeding scenario is that, you know, it's a perfectly natural thing that needed to be done.

00:48:13.000 --> 00:48:27.000
And there but there is no where there was no were provided for her to do it. And if somebody is running conferences, it's one of the things that I've always put into place that we you know we have a room designated for women who need to do that.

00:48:27.000 --> 00:48:33.000
Yeah, even if men want to quiet space they can have it too but you know you need to just think about these things.

00:48:33.000 --> 00:48:37.000
Yeah, because it's a challenge.

00:48:37.000 --> 00:48:51.000
Yeah. And this from, Angela, and we need to get more women on local councils, which was one of the. Yeah, it's you were making. And I, she is a councillor and it's only 15 councillors and just fiber women.

00:48:51.000 --> 00:48:59.000
Yeah, again, there's that childcare issue again from juice and the dinosaurs packing.

00:48:59.000 --> 00:49:02.000
Thanks, Jay.

00:49:02.000 --> 00:49:05.000
And I'm in school curriculum.

00:49:05.000 --> 00:49:07.000
From Anita.

00:49:07.000 --> 00:49:10.000
Yeah.

00:49:10.000 --> 00:49:25.000
Yeah, I mean we there's a there is discussion about citizenship in schools, but I mean, as, as somebody who works in schools, I will also tell you I'm not very sure that we've never been trained, there's nobody out there who knows how to deliver it.

00:49:25.000 --> 00:49:38.000
You know, we get packages from various organizations say well this is what you should do. But in order for us to get a good grip on it. What you need is somebody who really knows what they're doing, as opposed to somebody who's been given a book entitled

00:49:38.000 --> 00:49:53.000
to have a go at it. I know that we don't teach subjects we teach children, but things like this are quite complicated. And if there is going to be changed their needs to be more positive sport.

00:49:53.000 --> 00:49:57.000
What else do we have here.

00:49:57.000 --> 00:50:14.000
Oh, I think that must have some more comments. Okay, on an interesting one from Patrick, and the public violence is proportional electoral system but have never had a female pm.

00:50:14.000 --> 00:50:16.000
had female president so have.

00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:23.000
They have. Yeah, interesting though.

00:50:23.000 --> 00:50:35.000
This is a question actually from Jennifer. What do you think of the women's equality party and have to say that's not when they've heard of absolutely yeah it's Sandy toxics party.

00:50:35.000 --> 00:50:40.000
I think it's I think it's a.

00:50:40.000 --> 00:50:47.000
I think it's the kind of thing that we might need for a while. I think somebody.

00:50:47.000 --> 00:50:59.000
It's a little bit like thinking about suffragettes. The suffragettes came together as a stronger group of women to get things done. And I think the women's equality party has kind of a list of things that they want to get done and I suspect that once

00:50:59.000 --> 00:51:01.000
those things are done.

00:51:01.000 --> 00:51:08.000
They will disappear. They'll be separate so suddenly sublimated into another organization.

00:51:08.000 --> 00:51:12.000
And

00:51:12.000 --> 00:51:14.000
if we are in a position.

00:51:14.000 --> 00:51:20.000
And I think we are where we need to speak as great.

00:51:20.000 --> 00:51:33.000
Then, such an organization is required. What I think he's going to be challenging is getting it one more widely recognized. I mean, I noticed somebody mentioned, Caroline Lucas.

00:51:33.000 --> 00:51:37.000
And, you know.

00:51:37.000 --> 00:51:42.000
Yeah, excellent party in a party, we should be taking notice of it for all of these time.

00:51:42.000 --> 00:51:52.000
That very very small numbers, you need more people. And it's like that wonderful unison that that is land and the bear. If you've seen it.

00:51:52.000 --> 00:51:58.000
Get out of the way and the bear doesn't hear him because he's only one little tiny voice, but when everybody shows together.

00:51:58.000 --> 00:52:02.000
There has to move. And it's a bit like that.

00:52:02.000 --> 00:52:21.000
Yeah, comment from coddle in unison, and unite the unions have female general secretaries yeah that's that's that's a brilliant move because as much as anything else, and they are also the kind of kind of groups that produce entities.

00:52:21.000 --> 00:52:40.000
to the unions, and that's that's a very positive situation, and it also says something about the way that that working is being thought off now, as well, because I'm in unison must have must be pretty much more female members than males because of the

00:52:40.000 --> 00:52:44.000
nature of the work that they're supporting. Yeah.

00:52:44.000 --> 00:52:59.000
And another comment here from Miranda. She thinks that his book, which is good, and women playing football is no, and that's very true. That's true. And her girls never got to play at school, I didn't.

00:52:59.000 --> 00:53:03.000
I'm not even a play time.

00:53:03.000 --> 00:53:12.000
When I was at school, certainly the sports that we did as girls were quite different from what the boys that sometimes join, but.

00:53:12.000 --> 00:53:15.000
And, yeah, it's quite interesting.

00:53:15.000 --> 00:53:22.000
Yeah, I mean we have this situation that my school where the boys did.

00:53:22.000 --> 00:53:31.000
They had a unit number of two terms of self defence and he goes high country dancing.

00:53:31.000 --> 00:53:37.000
So if anybody attacks me I have to do I have to get them with my Miller.

00:53:37.000 --> 00:53:42.000
The boys might have liked to do the country dancing as well. Exactly, so.

00:53:42.000 --> 00:53:43.000
Okay.

00:53:43.000 --> 00:53:55.000
And right what we'll do is I'm going to attempt, I can share those poor results before I go on to Michael at the end of the lecture, let me see if I can do it.

00:53:55.000 --> 00:54:07.000
And, in fact, yes, I think I can have the appeared on the screen if they have no I think people you might need to scroll down to see all the results but I'll just leave that up on there for a little minute.

00:54:07.000 --> 00:54:25.000
And I know that was one of you in particular, to be able to see those.

00:54:25.000 --> 00:54:43.000
Well, we're looking at that actually is one final question that's come in from. I don't know whether this is, you'll be what you'll be able to answer but she's asking, What is your take on making misogyny a hate crime, or how do we make sure that happens.

00:54:43.000 --> 00:55:03.000
That might be slightly off topic but i don't know if i mean i got some that I, personally, and this is, I think this is the only way I can speak about this nice I am I am concerned about some elements of the whole idea of creating legislation against

00:55:03.000 --> 00:55:16.000
certain sorts of hate crime, because it's not because I don't agree with the idea of criminalizing some elements of this. I am concerned about how it can be used.

00:55:16.000 --> 00:55:19.000
You know, we tell we.

00:55:19.000 --> 00:55:34.000
What does it mean, how do you define it as being something that is so often image misogynistic that we are going to legislate against it.

00:55:34.000 --> 00:55:40.000
I would rather go at it from the point of view of educating against it.

00:55:40.000 --> 00:55:53.000
You know, let's let's eradicate some expressions of speech let's, let's do away with man up, let let's do away with. Yeah, take it like a man.

00:55:53.000 --> 00:55:56.000
Oh, you throw like a girl.

00:55:56.000 --> 00:56:03.000
Let's do away with those let's start with those because those are misogynistic statements, but I'm not, I don't want anybody arrested for that.

00:56:03.000 --> 00:56:08.000
What I do want is for somebody to say no, that's not the way we talk about that.

Lecture

Lecture 92 - Raymond Williams, the WEA and creating an educated democracy

Raymond Williams (1921 - 1988) was one of the leading figures in the British ‘New Left’ of the 1950s & ‘60s. He enjoyed a distinguished career at Cambridge University, and developed a new discipline of Cultural Studies. But before that, he shunned the chance to become a research fellow in academia, and turned instead to wanting to teach 'real people' through adult education, and became a WEA tutor for 15 years, between 1946 and 1961.

In this lecture we will explore Williams’ life and his impact at the WEA, where he developed his ideas about the need for lifelong learning, and pioneered the use of discussion in his courses - insisting that adult education was a shared and mutually stimulating experience. We shall also discover why his upbringing in the Welsh Borders remained of huge significance to him, and shall briefly examine some of his influential thinking about ‘culture’. A great way to mark World Thinking Day on 22nd February!

Video transcript

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:12.000
Okay. All right. Good evening everybody. I hope you can all hear me. Okay.

00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:27.000
Wherever you are, greetings and it's still a sunny knowledge at the moment very wet this morning. And we had a tremendous hailstorm halfway through the afternoon but the moment it's quite a pleasant Sunday evening

00:00:27.000 --> 00:00:32.000
so welcome from me and greetings from the East of England.

00:00:32.000 --> 00:00:51.000
And so, I do have a particular interest in Raymond Williams which has been there for all best part of 20 years or so and so Hi I'm a founder trustee of the Raymond Williams foundation.

00:00:51.000 --> 00:00:54.000
And

00:00:54.000 --> 00:01:10.000
it's not simply a matter of an interest in Raymond Williams that I have. But I found him very influential in the way that I approach my teaching, and my experiences.

00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:18.000
And this group that does this body that I'm a trustee of the raven Williams foundation.

00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:38.000
Before the pandemic, we would have regular residential weekends, every year.

00:01:38.000 --> 00:01:41.000
maybe we've had guests speakers talking to us about.

00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:50.000
And we will spend the small groups and we will discuss them between us, and then report back to the main session.

00:01:50.000 --> 00:02:01.000
And I found after a couple of years that that this this began to influence to a very large extent, how I approach my own teaching.

00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:04.000
So as a web a tutor.

00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:09.000
What I like to do is to use a lot of discussion.

00:02:09.000 --> 00:02:11.000
So if I'm teaching face to face.

00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:27.000
If I'm in a big enough room without necessarily telling the students what I'm doing. I might split the room into different groups or put groups of chairs out so that at some point I can say what okay you're going to that group you're, and I want you to

00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:37.000
discuss amongst yourselves, this because I don't want people just listening to me for a whole 90 minutes so I want people to talk to each other.

00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:43.000
And it's been very interesting over the last you know two years using zoom.

00:02:43.000 --> 00:02:48.000
That of course now I'm not just talking to people in Norwich but I got people from all over the country.

00:02:48.000 --> 00:02:57.000
In front of me. So I can split you I'm going to do this tonight, by the way, but I could split you into breakout rooms and get you talking to each other.

00:02:57.000 --> 00:03:06.000
So, to me, this is a very important aspect of the way that the WVA were and indeed adult education or to work.

00:03:06.000 --> 00:03:24.000
And so I'm just introducing this because this is something which has very much come out of my studying of Raymond Williams and being involved with other people who actually studied or supervised by Raymond Williams himself.

00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:35.000
So it's all part of this ongoing process so it's actually a very important piece of my attitude to teach it.

00:03:35.000 --> 00:03:44.000
And I'll come back to say a bit more about this a little bit later on but I suppose, first of all, I should say.

00:03:44.000 --> 00:03:47.000
Why, Raymond Williams.

00:03:47.000 --> 00:03:49.000
And it's.

00:03:49.000 --> 00:04:00.000
It is sometimes slightly alarming in that the people that I am familiar with and the people I work with and so on and other members of the foundation.

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:04.000
We're all very familiar with Raymond Williams.

00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:17.000
And when I was doing my, my first degree I hadn't have a tutor who was very interested in my moon so I've actually been familiar with him since 19 7071.

00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:27.000
And so we can all talk to each other about this person, Raymond Williams, and we know what we're talking about. I hope.

00:04:27.000 --> 00:04:38.000
But very often, you know I can mention his name to other people, and they sort of look at me a bit of scars and say, No here snooker player. And that's one of the comments I have recently.

00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:48.000
So, to some extent I feel as if I have to go back to basics, sometime to explain just to run with Williams walls.

00:04:48.000 --> 00:05:06.000
Now, the reason that I've been talking about him so much over the last year, is that he was born in July of 1921. So last year. We were celebrating his centenary, and there were lots of activities going on around it.

00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:14.000
Say I'm involved with the red moons Foundation, we completely revised our website for the centurion rates are celebrated.

00:05:14.000 --> 00:05:16.000
And it's not finished.

00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:28.000
There are still various activities carrying on until April of this year but that was the sort of stimulus to do a lot of extra work on him.

00:05:28.000 --> 00:05:34.000
So on the one hand it's been a matter of trying to explain to people who just who he was.

00:05:34.000 --> 00:05:53.000
But also, and of course in the sense of this evening, I haven't got that much time to tell you everything about him whatsoever. But I'm going to give a bit of a plug, at the end to a course, who was running about Robin Williams, but it's also this question

00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:56.000
of who he wants.

00:05:56.000 --> 00:06:04.000
And there are an awful lot of very interesting points about Raymond would say have an interesting life anyway.

00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:20.000
But he was one of the most significant figures in what became known as the new left in Britain in the 1950s 1960s and 70s that into the 1970s.

00:06:20.000 --> 00:06:30.000
And he came from a background which was strongly socialist he did become very briefly involved with the Communist Party in Great Britain.

00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:37.000
Although I would say he was always a bit of a semi detached a member of the Communist Party.

00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:46.000
But after the Second World War, as you get into the 50s and 60s. He was very much one of the the leading figures.

00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:52.000
Within this field that included people like Stuart Hall Eric Hobsbawm Edward Thompson and some.

00:06:52.000 --> 00:07:04.000
He was part of that and he became one of the most influential thinkers and writers within that New Left movement as it became known.

00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:22.000
He was a very prolific thinker, and writer, but use a huge number of works, which is quite difficult for me to deal with in, in many ways, because I even in a five week course.

00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:30.000
I can't cover everything that he talked about, and everything. he dealt with there's almost too much information there.

00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:34.000
But he was enormously influential figure.

00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:43.000
And he was often regarded as being the father of what became known as cultural studies.

00:07:43.000 --> 00:07:58.000
Now this point if you, you know, think, Oh, good. And another Disney type courses that you have. The way I first got involved with rainbow warriors was was through someone who has studied with him.

00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:17.000
day or of idea of cultural studies. Now, I'm going to go on a bit later on to explain a little bit of what I mean about cultural studies and what culture meant to Raymond Williams because it's a very very significant part of his thinking, and it's a very

00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:37.000
important part of his thinking, but I'll come back to that little bit later on. And he was also an extraordinarily prescient writer as well he could very often see what he thought would trends developing within society and within politics, especially

00:08:37.000 --> 00:08:54.000
he was outline, sometimes he would warn you about, and to a surprising degree, some of those things have come to pass that he was warnings about but again, I'm going to come back to that a little bit later on.

00:08:54.000 --> 00:08:59.000
But to begin with, I'm going to show you some illustrations shortly.

00:08:59.000 --> 00:09:10.000
And in many ways. Well, the most important things about Robbie Williams was that he was born in Wales in the border country.

00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:31.000
He was born in a small village called Pandy, which is about six, seven miles north of Abergavenny in the shadow of the black mountains, so not far away from the Welsh valance avail Murtha that area, not too far away from the Brecon Beacons either not too

00:09:31.000 --> 00:09:51.000
far away from Hereford on the English side, but that area of the border country was very, very important to him, and he would go on, eventually to write five novels, so he's not just a theoretician, he's not just a political philosopher, he always wanted

00:09:51.000 --> 00:09:59.000
to be a writer of fiction and indeed his life was based around English literature in many ways.

00:09:59.000 --> 00:10:15.000
But he wrote five novels, and they are all set in that area around the black mountains, very very significant to him. He always maintained during his life that his background was very important.

00:10:15.000 --> 00:10:39.000
And he came from a very working class background his father was signalman for Great Western our at the local station. His mother was a domestic worker, in effect, but he always said that he got his sense of community from living in this small Welsh village.

00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:44.000
And more importantly, he got a sense of solidarity from it.

00:10:44.000 --> 00:10:51.000
Now he was born in 1921, so he was only five years old when the general strike happened.

00:10:51.000 --> 00:11:02.000
His father, as a railway signal one, and an active trade you need to stand a moderate support of the Labour Party was very heavily involved with the general strike.

00:11:02.000 --> 00:11:08.000
And of course South Wales, especially the values you know it was an area.

00:11:08.000 --> 00:11:18.000
Very very strongly affected by the general strike of 1926 so what it was was aware of this, as he was growing up and he always took this with him.

00:11:18.000 --> 00:11:34.000
And he always maintained that it was his background, and that area, which actually developed, most of his adult thinking. And suddenly, His socialism came from that background.

00:11:34.000 --> 00:11:37.000
I would love to ask me this point if you've got any questions.

00:11:37.000 --> 00:11:40.000
We'll keep them for for later.

00:11:40.000 --> 00:12:03.000
So his backgrounds in the wash borders is hugely important to him and he sees constantly referring to him as he was growing up, he was regarded as quite a brilliant scholar, coming from that sort of backgrounds, and he won a county scholarship to go to

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:12.000
the grammar school in Abergavenny while he was there, he excelled in everything you did he was, he was very keen sportsman as well and from there.

00:12:12.000 --> 00:12:28.000
He won a national scholarship to go to Cambridge to study English literature as he's growing up in the 1930s, and at that point he's very much a pacifist.

00:12:28.000 --> 00:12:43.000
And he's involved with the peace pledge union. And in the August of 1937. He is sent by the, the junior branch of the peace pleasure to attend an international conference in Geneva.

00:12:43.000 --> 00:12:49.000
And this was looking at you know the rise of fascism and what was happening in Europe.

00:12:49.000 --> 00:12:57.000
So he attended as a delegate this youth conference in Geneva on the way back returning to England he managed in Paris.

00:12:57.000 --> 00:13:00.000
to find enough time to get off the train.

00:13:00.000 --> 00:13:15.000
And to attend the International Exhibition that was being held in Paris, of that time. This is the international International Exhibition that featured Guernica the painted by Picasso, that everyone is familiar with.

00:13:15.000 --> 00:13:26.000
He doesn't make any reference to whether he went to the Spanish privileged to see it or not. But the one thing he did make sure he did was to visit the Soviet Pavilion.

00:13:26.000 --> 00:13:44.000
And when he was there, he bought himself a copy of the Communist Manifesto. And so for the first time at the age of 16. He started reading about marks and angles and getting involved in that sort of aspect.

00:13:44.000 --> 00:14:01.000
So, in October 1939 he wants to stay scholarship to attend Trinity College, Cambridge to study English. Now, I haven't got to that point I'm not just going to come out, briefly, and show you a few illustrations, if I may.

00:14:01.000 --> 00:14:17.000
Now, I have some issues with the way that I can show my presentations. So I'm using this particular format, and I hope you can all see it. Okay. That's the first slide just to remind you, who we all are.

00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:42.000
And we will come back to that again. Now, this is a very well known portraits of Raymond Williams taken in the 1970s.

00:14:42.000 --> 00:14:53.000
is to make hope possible, rather than despair convincing bear that in mind so I'm going to come back to that in just a moment. Now, I hope you can all see this nice and clear.

00:14:53.000 --> 00:15:11.000
There are relatively speaking, very few illustrations of whims himself. They tend to always show me to check shirt and smoking a pipe read lots of books behind him but you very quickly realized that there aren't a great many different illustrations on

00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:30.000
this another one from slightly later in his life so you get an idea, at least at this point of what he looked like. Now, I hope you can see this well enough because I thought it was important to show you and give you a little social of the areas in which

00:15:30.000 --> 00:15:45.000
he was brought up now. Handy I hope you can see my cursor moving here, handy. The village he was brought up it is here, and is just about six miles up the valley from our government.

00:15:45.000 --> 00:16:04.000
OK, so the English border is about 10 miles. This way to the right, to the east, with Herefords just off at Brecon and the Brecon Beacons is just off the picture up here, the values of avail mother Ted Ville are just down here to the bottom left, but

00:16:04.000 --> 00:16:23.000
here are the black mountains and he often refers to living in the shadow of the black mountains. So this is the border country that he grew up in, and was very important to him, and was enormously influential on his later think if we need to, we can always

00:16:23.000 --> 00:16:38.000
And if we need to, we can always come back to some of these slides at the end, I hope we've got time. I put this one in, it's just Raymond Williams in his teenage years, We are trying at Pandora station in the mid 1930s.

00:16:38.000 --> 00:16:51.000
This is significant, say his his father was a railway signal for the Great Western Railway, and he had a very great affection for his father nothing his father went through.

00:16:51.000 --> 00:16:54.000
And when he was a teenager.

00:16:54.000 --> 00:17:12.000
And he thought that, probably, this is what he was going to do. He had no ideas of going into academia or anything that probably he would he would follow his father into a job on the runways that was sort of what was expected and you know what he anticipated

00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:22.000
by here is 1939, ready to actually go off to Cambridge, having won this scholarship to Trinity College,

00:17:22.000 --> 00:17:41.000
he met his wife, joy, while he was an undergraduate at Cambridge, they got married in 1942. During the war, and this is them with their family Murdock, the youngest one in the middle of the melon, and a Darren in front of them.

00:17:41.000 --> 00:17:43.000
Very very well.

00:17:43.000 --> 00:17:56.000
Notice, of course. So this was actually they use this photo for a Christmas card in 1951, as you can see at the bottom. So this was his home life. That was his family.

00:17:56.000 --> 00:18:11.000
This is him addressing a meeting in the early 1960s. Now I'm pretty certain that this was a cnd meeting. I'm not 100% sure about it but I am pretty certain, it is.

00:18:11.000 --> 00:18:33.000
But yeah, he was a very well known figure on the left, he was very active in cnd amongst other things, so I think by the time you get to that periods of the 96 is this this would have been a pretty typical picture of Raymond Williams addressing a meeting.

00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:48.000
This is him at Cambridge. Nice Nice one, I will say a bit more about with Frank commodes literary critic commentator fellow member of the Communist Party who then left in much the same way that the Williams has.

00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:57.000
And so this is just to I'll just put this in just to show that this is what he was, he was doing during this period.

00:18:57.000 --> 00:19:03.000
Okay, Now that's a blank one I'm going to come out I've got one more leverage I'm going to show you at the end.

00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:16.000
So now I would love to say at this point or ask you. Have you got any comments or questions but if you have, please post them in chat. And then we'll get back to you at the end.

00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:27.000
Now you're going to have to excuse me for one second because I'm up in my attic here is getting dark so I've got to put the light on.

00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:32.000
Right. Hopefully that's the human touch that comes in to these things.

00:19:32.000 --> 00:19:46.000
Okay, so he's had this so very brilliant academic career as a teenager when he goes up to Cambridge.

00:19:46.000 --> 00:19:56.000
And he becomes a member of the Communist Party. Yeah, That was the way to go at the time as were all his friends were going.

00:19:56.000 --> 00:20:07.000
He has very little to say in the 1930s about for instance what he thought about the Spanish Civil War. And what was happening there.

00:20:07.000 --> 00:20:17.000
But by the time he is undergraduate, Cambridge. That is the way that has gotten has been very influenced by reading the Communist Manifesto.

00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:28.000
There's a wonderful essay that he wrote a couple of decades later called. You're a Marxist aren't you, and he answers that question.

00:20:28.000 --> 00:20:36.000
And he says, in that essay that well, sort of, but not fully.

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:51.000
He says that the person who had the most influence upon his thinking was undoubtedly Karl Marx, but he never saw himself as a dogmatic Marxist.

00:20:51.000 --> 00:20:54.000
He was a member of the Communist Party.

00:20:54.000 --> 00:21:07.000
Briefly, but he was always something of describing as a fellow traveller but someone who was sort of a semi detached member of that community.

00:21:07.000 --> 00:21:14.000
Certainly as an undergraduate and then later, when he did, enter, academia himself.

00:21:14.000 --> 00:21:27.000
Yes, I mean, a very large number of his colleagues were Communist Party members, save his clothes for Eric Hobsbawm AP Thompson's do a whole song.

00:21:27.000 --> 00:21:36.000
But he was always sort of semi detached in the sense that he could be quite critical, certainly of dogmatic Marxism.

00:21:36.000 --> 00:21:53.000
And in this essay he wrote your Marxist, aren't you, he answers that by saying that he's not sure if he is or not, but he wants to make it quite clear that he is very happy to have been influenced by that line of thinking.

00:21:53.000 --> 00:22:07.000
And he is very happy to be regarded as a member of the Marxist tradition that carries on that questioning of society what it's about proposing different ideas and different approach in some.

00:22:07.000 --> 00:22:20.000
So that's the way that he sort of couches, his views. So, not a dogmatic Marxist at all, and I'm gonna come back so something a bit more about that in the moment.

00:22:20.000 --> 00:22:39.000
The reason I say he was never a full time member of the Communist Party was that in July of 1940, having served and done. So, one year as an undergraduate at Cambridge, he enlisted for the army, which was strictly against Communist Party guidelines, at

00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:40.000
the time.

00:22:40.000 --> 00:22:51.000
So he says he never left the Communist Party, he was never expelled from the Communist Party. It just sort of disappeared in that respect.

00:22:51.000 --> 00:22:57.000
But he did join the Armed Forces he served as a tank commander after DJ.

00:22:57.000 --> 00:23:05.000
And he describes in some detail moving from Normandy up into Germany.

00:23:05.000 --> 00:23:07.000
He says he was absolutely appalled.

00:23:07.000 --> 00:23:27.000
When he reached Hamburg, because everything that he has been told was that Hamburg was just attacked by bombing as a military target, and when when he arrived in haven't spoken Hamburg, he saw that clearly wasn't true that there were various, you know,

00:23:27.000 --> 00:23:39.000
very large areas of the civilian part of Hamburg, which had been destroyed by Allied bombing, so the other.

00:23:39.000 --> 00:23:47.000
Anyway, when he came back, so he's married in 1940 to start the family with his wife joy.

00:23:47.000 --> 00:24:03.000
And he was given an early discharge from the army so that he could complete his studies. Okay, which which he did, he completed the tripods and graduated with first class honors in English.

00:24:03.000 --> 00:24:24.000
Now at that point he was offered a senior research fellowship at Trinity College, but he refused it, and that was it would have been financially you know to his advantage but he refused it, because at that point, he did not want so he is what 21 of the

00:24:24.000 --> 00:24:25.000
time.

00:24:25.000 --> 00:24:30.000
And he didn't want to go into academia that.

00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:39.000
And, and what do you want to do instead was, was to actually meet with what he called me up real people.

00:24:39.000 --> 00:24:54.000
So he left Cambridge, and he joined what was then known as the Oxford delicacy. This was in effect the extra mural, Department of Oxford University.

00:24:54.000 --> 00:24:58.000
And at that point, 1940s.

00:24:58.000 --> 00:25:06.000
The Oxford delicacy actually offered education but almost the whole of Southeast England.

00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:08.000
They were in charge of it.

00:25:08.000 --> 00:25:17.000
And he was appointed a book, as a lecturer.

00:25:17.000 --> 00:25:20.000
for the southeast region.

00:25:20.000 --> 00:25:28.000
And he went to live, various, various times in seafoods in a Sussex, and in Hastings.

00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:39.000
And he was covering in the area as a tutor of most of that parts of southeast, England.

00:25:39.000 --> 00:25:53.000
And although he was working for what was called the Oxford delicacy effect almost all of the current classes that he was teaching were organized through the WA, because that was the existing setup.

00:25:53.000 --> 00:26:05.000
Now, I want to just give you a quote this is from a series of lectures that he gave many years later, looking back on his life lot largely autobiographical.

00:26:05.000 --> 00:26:09.000
It says about this decision.

00:26:09.000 --> 00:26:20.000
So the main reason was that I could not see the point I was quite clear now that I've got a hell of a lot of writing to do, and I really wanted to get on with it.

00:26:20.000 --> 00:26:23.000
I particularly wanted to write a novel.

00:26:23.000 --> 00:26:35.000
It may sound odd in relation to the sense of being deeply blocked, that I was describing but I was still attempting to maintain the productive cultural emphasis of the 30 years.

00:26:35.000 --> 00:26:46.000
Then I and my friends will thank you rich and Clifford Collins, we're going to run a journal. We were convinced we were going to be able to build up a periodical and a press.

00:26:46.000 --> 00:27:00.000
One of the other things I was going to do was to write a documentary script for Michael RM, who was by then, and the assistant director with rotter. So we were going to make a film, we were going to start a magazine, there seemed much more exciting projects,

00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:19.000
than doing a thesis, the shape of the immediate years was the one would take WVA classes to support oneself, through them interesting approach, but it's very clear for what he says that at that point, someone talking about 1946.

00:27:19.000 --> 00:27:22.000
He wanted to be a writer.

00:27:22.000 --> 00:27:29.000
That was helping out so you don't degree in English is made interest was in English teacher and he wants to be a writer.

00:27:29.000 --> 00:27:44.000
So he came up with this regime, which he followed for many years, which was that he would write in the morning, in the afternoon he would read to back up what he was writing about, and in the evening.

00:27:44.000 --> 00:27:52.000
He would teach web eight classes, and it was the classroom, which were for workers, then so that's why they were evening classes.

00:27:52.000 --> 00:28:10.000
And that was how we would support himself, but he also felt very strongly that he wanted to connect with ordinary people. And this was what adult education came very very strongly to mean to you.

00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:16.000
Now, another quote about working with the WPA.

00:28:16.000 --> 00:28:26.000
He said, when I got my job in the extra middle of delicacy at Oxford, which control the scattered region extend from Staffordshire in the north to suspect in the south.

00:28:26.000 --> 00:28:30.000
I was appointed to a Sussex and went to live in Seaford.

00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:36.000
The social character my classes, was extremely mixed.

00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:51.000
At one level. There was the class law event in Hastings, essentially with the local Trades Council, which was called public expression and simply involves specific training in public writing and public speaking.

00:28:51.000 --> 00:29:05.000
There seemed little point in teaching the writing of essays. I taught the writing of reports, minutes memoranda and committee speaking, and all reports skills relevant to their work.

00:29:05.000 --> 00:29:13.000
At the other extreme, you will get a class of commuter housewives in Hey was thief who wanted to read some literature.

00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:19.000
Perfectly serious and their interest, but an entirely different social composition.

00:29:19.000 --> 00:29:39.000
Then I had a fair number, in which there was a mixture of the two elements including of course the substantial number of wagers one discovers the third or fourth meeting produce their novel or autobiography, their short stories or poems, an enormous amount

00:29:39.000 --> 00:29:49.000
of unknown writing of this sort goes on. It was a mixture. I could live with. So this is his attitude to adult education.

00:29:49.000 --> 00:29:54.000
And it's something which is very, very important.

00:29:54.000 --> 00:30:10.000
And it's something that will stay with him really for the rest of his life and this is why he is so influential in terms of looking at the history of the Wi Fi because those of you who might be familiar with the original foundation that who nice know

00:30:10.000 --> 00:30:12.000
three.

00:30:12.000 --> 00:30:30.000
It was very much about bringing a university type education to people who had not had the chance to go to university. So it was very much based on lectures and tutorials and some and Raymond wins or what was one of the first people to really go against

00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:49.000
that and to actually say that adult education has to be a shared experience is something that the tutor must learn from. As much as the student loans from, and he is really one of the first to begin to follow this path.

00:30:49.000 --> 00:30:51.000
And then to emphasize it.

00:30:51.000 --> 00:31:06.000
Now, he was a tutor for the WVA from 1946 to 1961, so for 15 years, very significant part of his adult life.

00:31:06.000 --> 00:31:09.000
He was a wa tutor.

00:31:09.000 --> 00:31:25.000
And when he left in 1961 he was finally offered a position as a senior lecturer in English literature at Cambridge University. By that time he was ready for academia, and you saw that that was the way he wanted to go.

00:31:25.000 --> 00:31:40.000
So, 1961 his life changes, fundamentally, and in that year, he published this, which I've got a copy of it, an open letter to WVA tutors.

00:31:40.000 --> 00:32:00.000
And this is we did actually make this available on the the web a website a couple of years ago. I've got no idea if it's still there or not, but he said some very interesting things in this, this was written as a web a tutor to other web a chooses the

00:32:00.000 --> 00:32:15.000
important or most significant statement, he makes his he says within it. I've often defined my own social purpose as the creation of an educated and pass it, and participating democracy.

00:32:15.000 --> 00:32:28.000
So that's what he saw he was doing. He was involved in trying to get people through the means of adult education to take a more active role in democracy their part in society.

00:32:28.000 --> 00:32:47.000
And so, I'm having said that, I've just remembered something which is one of the things I alluded to earlier on, I meant to draw your attention but I didn't forgot I showed you that slide, saying that to be truly radical, is to make hope possible rather

00:32:47.000 --> 00:32:55.000
than to spare convincing. What I meant to share with you was, don't worry I'm like ideas.

00:32:55.000 --> 00:32:57.000
I've got the T shirt.

00:32:57.000 --> 00:33:02.000
So they are philosophy football you can buy your own copy of it but they will, so that's anyway.

00:33:02.000 --> 00:33:07.000
I wore that especially for your benefit this evening so

00:33:07.000 --> 00:33:21.000
he goes on in this essay. So, this is worth repeating in the 1960s. When many people would tell you that the WA is historic mission is over.

00:33:21.000 --> 00:33:40.000
with the coming of better opportunities in the schools, the exceptional mind in the poor family is spotted young and is given a real chance. Yes, but this was never the heart of the web is purpose, of course, the exceptional minds must get their chance.

00:33:40.000 --> 00:33:44.000
But what about everyone else.

00:33:44.000 --> 00:33:48.000
I'm towards the end of this open letter he says.

00:33:48.000 --> 00:34:09.000
This may but it's been a challenge to new and imaginative teaching is constant. This may be a new methods in an experience class, or the profoundly important work with new kinds of students who have never before made such contact with for education.

00:34:09.000 --> 00:34:27.000
In recent years, I have discussed d h Lawrence with working minors discussed methods of arguments with building workers. Discuss newspapers, with young trade unionists discuss television with apprentices in training.

00:34:27.000 --> 00:34:40.000
To me, these have been formative experiences, and I have learned as much as I have taught a whole world of work is waiting have many kinds. For all who are ready to try it.

00:34:40.000 --> 00:34:54.000
The next few years may see a transformation in trade union education, which is a vital social importance. The development of work with women's organizations and young workers is also extremely promising.

00:34:54.000 --> 00:35:09.000
All this of course, in addition to the familiar work in tutorial classes and residential courses were experiment in teaching is often just as important, but none of us can sit back and wait for this to happen.

00:35:09.000 --> 00:35:16.000
It will only happen as widely as it needs to. If we all get in and work.

00:35:16.000 --> 00:35:29.000
So that's part of this letter that he addressed to other who chooses. And I would, I mean I've I've been a web a true to myself for 25 years now.

00:35:29.000 --> 00:35:42.000
And apart from taking this idea of discussion from Raymond Williams very largely and trying to use it in my own courses.

00:35:42.000 --> 00:35:57.000
And I think much of what he has to say is, is still, you know every betters as relevant so I would argue that Raymond Williams is a very profound representative of what had our education, really ought to be like and I hope I'm seeing loads of questions

00:35:57.000 --> 00:36:09.000
coming through chats now about about that. Now when he. The other thing I just want to go through this so very quickly release, make sure we've got time for a few questions at the end.

00:36:09.000 --> 00:36:24.000
And when he returns to Cambridge in 1961. So having spent 15 years working in adult education largely through the web a.

00:36:24.000 --> 00:36:49.000
In the late 50s early 60s he begins to produce a series of what became a very very significant and important books, and I've got a couple of them down here, and 1958, a published culture is ordinary 1961 he follows it with the loan revolution.

00:36:49.000 --> 00:37:08.000
And if any of you are interested, you know the end I mean I can hope it through Fiona produce a reading list for this if you if you want to follow any of this, but he started generating this idea of culture, which is why I said that when he.

00:37:08.000 --> 00:37:15.000
Yeah, one of the things he's famous for is soon as I got my pile of books and the next thing.

00:37:15.000 --> 00:37:20.000
He is regarded as the father of cultural studies.

00:37:20.000 --> 00:37:23.000
What happened was, during the 50s.

00:37:23.000 --> 00:37:38.000
He began to have some arguments with his comrades within the Communist Party. Although, as I've said he was always a semi detached member about the insistence on cars and class conflict.

00:37:38.000 --> 00:37:57.000
Now although he says, the biggest influence on his thinking was Karl Marx, there are certain aspects of this that he disagreed with and he thought what was more important was rather than looking at this very narrow issue of class and class conflict was

00:37:57.000 --> 00:38:04.000
something that he began to describe as culture.

00:38:04.000 --> 00:38:24.000
And what he meant by this was that it is actually, it's not the class that you are born into. Or you grow up in. It's your whole life experience. This is the important aspect and this is what will form your adult views, your opinions, your politics, so

00:38:24.000 --> 00:38:46.000
he expands from just looking at class into this idea of culture, and that is what he calls it, and that is what he begins to emphasize, and I just wanted to give you a couple of quotes from culture is all know so i mean this is this is 1958.

00:38:46.000 --> 00:39:02.000
Having said that, I'm going to lost my, my quote.

00:39:02.000 --> 00:39:06.000
now I've got this disappeared somewhere.

00:39:06.000 --> 00:39:12.000
What is talking about is, it's actually your entire experience which which forms you.

00:39:12.000 --> 00:39:25.000
And that is what gives you your background, in effect, and that is actually the most important thing that acts upon you. And what he's mainly interested in.

00:39:25.000 --> 00:39:43.000
Is that what he brings to called culture is not just a single aspect is what he describes as a process. This is something that you develops what you grew up with is what you develop is what influences you in the end.

00:39:43.000 --> 00:39:48.000
And as for no sweat during the 50s while his formulating this.

00:39:48.000 --> 00:40:00.000
He, we know that he was reading a lot of Antonio Gramsci the Italian Marxist who talks about I mean he's, best known for talking about, Hey gamma.

00:40:00.000 --> 00:40:23.000
And what grams she meant by her gamma is not just how you are ruled or leadership, but it's how you maintain that a gram she was arguing that those who are in positions of ruling, a country, he's writing in Fascist Italy and 1930s.

00:40:23.000 --> 00:40:33.000
And, but it's how they maintain so how are they the ruling class convince you that what they're doing is the right way of doing things.

00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:52.000
And what Graham she argued, was that it was now up to the working class to have more sense of their own confidence, their own culture, so that they could build up their own money give themselves a position of strength to attack the state and eventually

00:40:52.000 --> 00:40:54.000
lead to revolution.

00:40:54.000 --> 00:41:13.000
This was very influential on landlines. And this is where his, his arguments really developed the what you've got to do is to recognize this this whole aspects of culture, which lies behind it, that there is a thing which is a working class culture.

00:41:13.000 --> 00:41:31.000
This is what is the basic thesis in his the long revolution, published in 1961, which you could almost say is the same as Edward Thompson was working on at the time in terms of class consciousness.

00:41:31.000 --> 00:41:41.000
They're both saying that, after the Industrial Revolution, the working class began to realize that they had more in common with each other and with their offices.

00:41:41.000 --> 00:41:54.000
That's the beginnings of class consciousness which would lead to the development of socialism and so, so, Robin Williams is looking into exactly the same thing, exactly the same process.

00:41:54.000 --> 00:42:15.000
But he's opening it up into a bigger experience of what your life, tells you, this is really what he is is all about. And you can see the connection between his ideas about culture and his ideas about adult education.

00:42:15.000 --> 00:42:28.000
Yeah, to to back each other up they reinforce each other so you can see the general sort of drift that he's moving in. Throughout this period. So he's looking at this development of working class culture.

00:42:28.000 --> 00:42:42.000
He's doing it, when he's at Cambridge is a lecturer in English literature, he will eventually become the first, Professor of drama. At Cambridge University so he's very much writing from an English literature perspective.

00:42:42.000 --> 00:42:51.000
And he wrote numerous books about English literature, Marxism and literature and you know, you name it, he wrote about it.

00:42:51.000 --> 00:43:10.000
And one of the interesting ideas that he came came up with, which I know a lot of people have found this very influential, as in the long revolution he comes up with something that he calls a structure of feeling.

00:43:10.000 --> 00:43:13.000
And this is how he describes it, he said.

00:43:13.000 --> 00:43:18.000
The term I was suggested describe it is a structure of feeling.

00:43:18.000 --> 00:43:26.000
It says as firm and definite as structure suggests. Yes, it operates in the most delicate and least tangible parts about activity.

00:43:26.000 --> 00:43:37.000
In one sense the structure of feeling is the culture of a period is just a particular living result of all the elements in the general organization.

00:43:37.000 --> 00:43:48.000
And it says in this respect to the arts of a period, taking these to include characteristic approaches and tones in arguments are of major importance for here.

00:43:48.000 --> 00:44:09.000
If anywhere. This characteristic is likely to be expressed often not consciously, but by the fact that here in the only examples we have of recorded communication that outlives its barrows, the actual living sense the deep community, that makes the communication

00:44:09.000 --> 00:44:24.000
possible is naturally drawn upon. I do not mean that the structure of feeling any more than the social character is possessed. In the same way by the many individuals in the community, but I think it is a very deep and very wide possession.

00:44:24.000 --> 00:44:43.000
In all actual communities, precisely because it is on it that communication depends what is particularly interesting is that it does not seem to be in any formal sense, learned one generation may train, its successor, with reasonable success, and the

00:44:43.000 --> 00:45:00.000
social character or the general cultural pattern. But the new generation will have his own structure of feeling, which will not appear to have come from anywhere for him most distinctly, the changing organization is enacted in the organism.

00:45:00.000 --> 00:45:14.000
The new generation responsive its own ways to the unique world, it is inherited, taking up many continuity is that can be traced and reproducing many aspects of the organization, which can be separately described yet feeling his whole life in certain

00:45:14.000 --> 00:45:22.000
ways, differently, and shaping his creative response into a new structure of feeling.

00:45:22.000 --> 00:45:38.000
And so, I've had a lot of people say to me that that is one of the most influential things that they've ever come across. And so this is why two very large extent say he is known as the father of cultural studies, because he comes up with this idea of

00:45:38.000 --> 00:45:40.000
culture.

00:45:40.000 --> 00:45:49.000
Your life experience, forming you and forming your political views and everything else about you and how you respond to everything.

00:45:49.000 --> 00:46:00.000
And this was something which he was really at the forefront of developing. And you can see that adult education is an absolutely central part of it.

00:46:00.000 --> 00:46:06.000
That point keeping an eye on the clock I think I rest my case right Fiona.

00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:14.000
Thank you very much. That was really really enlightening and a really great insight into how Williams influence teaching at the WEA.

00:46:14.000 --> 00:46:21.000
And, which we can still see to do so. And let's, we've got some questions chat. So, from the top and we'll get through as many as many as we possibly can.

00:46:21.000 --> 00:46:34.000
From the top and we'll get through as many as many as we possibly can. No question from sue you were talking about, Williams as well Fritz and was he well speaking.

00:46:34.000 --> 00:46:55.000
No, he wasn't, and he was familiar with a lot of wealth and a lot of well sayings, but no he wasn't, and he's a bit ambivalent, much later in the 1970s which is actually the, I worked in Mid Wales for five years and in the mid 19 late 1970s.

00:46:55.000 --> 00:47:04.000
And he was actually very ambivalent with the way that the Welsh language society was going at the time and the, the bombings of second homes and so on.

00:47:04.000 --> 00:47:23.000
And so he felt that that was a bit of a narrow distraction. Most of the time, but he did emphasize that the sense of historical culture that you have is something you mustn't lose, and you must hold on to it.

00:47:23.000 --> 00:47:30.000
Thank you very much. No, and questions from Barbara, no cuts kind of two sides to this.

00:47:30.000 --> 00:47:40.000
What do you think, Williams would have thought of Corbin and Starmer. And what were his views on Stalin.

00:47:40.000 --> 00:47:55.000
Right now, first thing is always keep people in their historical context and never put words into their mouth, and given I'm installing there's actually quite a live issue for me because I've been teaching courses on the Spanish Civil War.

00:47:55.000 --> 00:48:06.000
Recently, which is another one of my, my main interests, and in that essay, I refer to your a Marxist Aren't you call your mom.

00:48:06.000 --> 00:48:22.000
He's very very interesting because he has this strangely ambivalent view of the labour movement as a whole because he says that, On the one hand, you've got the revolutionaries.

00:48:22.000 --> 00:48:33.000
And on the other extreme, you've got the Fabians those who believe in the evolutionary slow growth, working you know by convincing people of your, your arguments.

00:48:33.000 --> 00:48:50.000
And he said this was in the 1970s, he was writing this. He said he's always been struck, that the labour movement has always been in the middle somewhere and it, sometimes it goes one way and somebody goes the other way and it comes back in the middle

00:48:50.000 --> 00:49:00.000
and it goes the other way and the labour movement in Britain can never seem to make his mind up, whether he wants to be revolutionary, or he wants to be evolutionary.

00:49:00.000 --> 00:49:19.000
And I think his conclusion is that he would generally be more favourable to the revolutionary side because he felt that something needed to be done and you could just spend far too much time talking about things without doing anything.

00:49:19.000 --> 00:49:26.000
And so I think in terms of the original question, I mean I don't.

00:49:26.000 --> 00:49:38.000
Don't tell anyone I said this or next I don't want to be quoted on this, but I think he would have been very much in favour of Jeremy Corbyn very anti care storm, but that's just my view.

00:49:38.000 --> 00:49:43.000
All right, but you know just that's if I leave it there

00:49:43.000 --> 00:49:53.000
is a comment here from Brian I don't know if you saw it culture in the Communist Party and Putin would seem very relevant at the present time given current events.

00:49:53.000 --> 00:49:58.000
Okay, let's move on. Here's a question from Paul.

00:49:58.000 --> 00:50:08.000
And was it Williams ever associated with the Cambridge five Donald McLean, Dave Burgess etc etc.

00:50:08.000 --> 00:50:14.000
Partly. He certainly new Anthony blunt.

00:50:14.000 --> 00:50:23.000
And I'm not sure if it was McLean that he knew, but he. Yes, he was aware of them.

00:50:23.000 --> 00:50:33.000
But I don't think he was ever aware of just how much they were involved with Soviet communism.

00:50:33.000 --> 00:50:39.000
And because say, Raymond Williams, always.

00:50:39.000 --> 00:50:47.000
It was reasonably how to describe yourself as a Marxist but I'd say it was always a rather semi detached and slightly critical member certainly of communist dogma.

00:50:47.000 --> 00:51:04.000
So, at Cambridge, that that group was very very lively was very active. He knew a number of the people involved say he was a he was a lifelong friend of Eric HubSpot as well.

00:51:04.000 --> 00:51:16.000
And so who knew what was going on within the communist circles in Cambridge, but he was never sort of actively connected with the more actively involved with him.

00:51:16.000 --> 00:51:18.000
Okay, interesting.

00:51:18.000 --> 00:51:36.000
Right. What do we got next. This is a question from Andrew said that that Williams was a pacifist in the late 70s busted in 1940, any special reason for this change was a sort of dancing conversion or more gradual.

00:51:36.000 --> 00:51:45.000
No, I think it was much more simply, a recognition that the most important thing to do was to fight fascism.

00:51:45.000 --> 00:52:01.000
So say Williams doesn't really say anything about the Spanish Civil War, which I find that as a slightly odd omission. Really. And so it's not until after that, that he makes many comments about the threat of fascism.

00:52:01.000 --> 00:52:09.000
But I think that once you know the war started about the same time that he started his first year as an undergraduate.

00:52:09.000 --> 00:52:18.000
And I think by the time he got to the end of that year he realized that actually, you know, being being an undergraduate is not as important as fighting fascism.

00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:31.000
So it was that sort of drive I think which which caused him to enlist, but he is, I mean I just refer to his comments about Hamburg, and

00:52:31.000 --> 00:52:48.000
he wrote very critically about the conduct of the Second World War, and there's this one particular incident when he's in Normandy, and he's leading. He's a tank commander and he's leading a group of six tanks, and they come up against a group of German

00:52:48.000 --> 00:52:50.000
tanks.

00:52:50.000 --> 00:53:05.000
And he said, luckily for him. These were all fair marks SS tanks. So they were commanded by, you know, people you could recognize as being Nazis.

00:53:05.000 --> 00:53:23.000
Whereas if he'd have come up against a group of regular German Army tanks which will probably being driven by German workers. He would have been very much into Myers, whether to shoot at them or not, but because this was a fascist, an openly fascist group

00:53:23.000 --> 00:53:31.000
of tanks, he was quite happy to attack them. So he comes up you know with a lot of these interesting comments about the conduct of them.

00:53:31.000 --> 00:53:36.000
I think that was just like us it was being an anti fascist which drove me into it.

00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:38.000
See, okay.

00:53:38.000 --> 00:53:47.000
Right. And this is a question from john was Williams, and connected with the Open University in any way.

00:53:47.000 --> 00:54:01.000
I'm not directly but he did do a lot of work for the Open University, and especially given that one of his closest friends was still at home, who was very active in the Open University.

00:54:01.000 --> 00:54:22.000
If you look on YouTube, I there's not it There's a wonderful clip, it's about 16 minutes long, which was produced in 1984 appropriately and it's a program about George Orwell and Raymond Williams wrote a lot about George Orwell, and the program is fronted

00:54:22.000 --> 00:54:36.000
by Stuart Hall, but the main interview is with Raymond Williams and you can find the same, you know, just go to YouTube and look for Raymond Williams on George Orwell, but, and, but it's it's a really really interesting video.

00:54:36.000 --> 00:54:47.000
And so, Williams had connections with university he did deliver quite a lot of lectures, but he wasn't involved with the foundation of it on the running of it.

00:54:47.000 --> 00:54:54.000
Okay, okay. Hope that answers your question john. And now here's an interesting question from Sue.

00:54:54.000 --> 00:55:00.000
What do you think Williams would make of social media.

00:55:00.000 --> 00:55:03.000
Go to think.

00:55:03.000 --> 00:55:24.000
I think he would probably absolutely hate most of it. And I think the interesting thing about Raymond Williams is that he can be extremely funny. Yeah, music, at times, and quite cynical, and the way he writes, he has not overly serious.

00:55:24.000 --> 00:55:29.000
Although he does take his issues very seriously.

00:55:29.000 --> 00:55:37.000
And I my first connection with with him was in 1970 when I was an undergraduate, And I had to do.

00:55:37.000 --> 00:55:45.000
General Studies, as part of my degree and my, my tutor had been a student with Raymond Williams and.

00:55:45.000 --> 00:55:49.000
And he had just published his book called communications.

00:55:49.000 --> 00:55:56.000
And we did the experiments, based on what Raymond Williams are done, which was looking at the media.

00:55:56.000 --> 00:56:14.000
And so there's the print media which all the time so does a group of us we all had one newspaper, to look at each, and we had to read it for two weeks, and we had to analyze the number of column inches between the new sport fashion, all the different

00:56:14.000 --> 00:56:29.000
categories. And then we brought it all together, which is exactly what Williams had done himself in this book, communications, and my to show got us doing it as their own experiment, which came out with some really interesting results, actually.

00:56:29.000 --> 00:56:37.000
So, he was very aware of the media as it was in his day.

00:56:37.000 --> 00:56:46.000
He was very aware and warned against the ownership of media, becoming a dominant feature.

00:56:46.000 --> 00:56:54.000
And he died nice and ICA before the advent really off, you know, the computer.

00:56:54.000 --> 00:57:13.000
And so, again, it's rather difficult. I think to try to put words in his mouth, but I think you know what I know about Raymond Williams. I don't think he'd have been very fond of social media and I think that's the most, I can say about it, especially as

00:57:13.000 --> 00:57:22.000
nastiness. Yeah, well, and Okay, question from Barbara you were talking about the structure feeling.

00:57:22.000 --> 00:57:32.000
was asking, is the structure of feeling a general thing for a whole generation, for example hippies were different from the parents, or would it be different for each individual.

00:57:32.000 --> 00:57:42.000
You know what he's saying is, he was trying to move the debate, beyond just a class basis.

00:57:42.000 --> 00:57:57.000
And he was saying there's something much bigger than that. So, what he is identifying as culture is much more a reflection on how you as an individual relate to your life experiences.

00:57:57.000 --> 00:58:06.000
And those life experiences well affects the way that you then interact with other people in the way you develop your political thinking and and all the rest of it.

00:58:06.000 --> 00:58:26.000
So, it's not rigid, when he talks about it being a structure, what he's really referring to is that it does tend to move from one generation to another, so that the experiences that you have growing up in your generation may well be different from the

00:58:26.000 --> 00:58:42.000
experiences your parents had and the expense that your children will have, but they are all the same thing, basically. So what you've got to do is be open minded about taking what you can from these experiences.

00:58:42.000 --> 00:59:01.000
And, you know, being reasonable being logical about it. Some weighing up the evidence and and that's how you come to your own conclusions. And what he was arguing was that it's this this this sense of life experience, which is actually far more important

00:59:01.000 --> 00:59:17.000
than the class that you are born into. That's where the argument comes from. So you can be born into a very working class environment but you those attitudes may not save, stay with you.

00:59:17.000 --> 00:59:33.000
And it's the attitudes that you take with you, which are the more important reflection, even though you probably would never forget the attitudes that you felt that you were brought up in and and born with and this is, I think this is a direct relation

00:59:33.000 --> 00:59:51.000
to his upbringing in the world's borders that that sense of community, and solidarity, never left him there was always an absolutely you know fundamental part of his of his life and that's really what is informing is as all views on society and the way

00:59:51.000 --> 00:59:53.000
that it functions.

01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:40.000
Right. I think that's probably us so do you want to show us that final picture that you can, yes, if I can find it again.

01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:52.000
Right. Okay, if you can see that, okay I don't make it any bigger than what is happening is that I taught a course last term.

01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:58.000
Just a free session course about Raymond Williams as part of the centenary celebrations.

01:02:58.000 --> 01:03:06.000
And we decided to run it again but what we're doing is it's now going to become a five session course because as the tutor.

01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:17.000
I found very quickly that there just wasn't enough time to cover everything because he was such a prolific such wide ranging thinker, and writer.

01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:27.000
So we've got a new course coming up which will be advertised nationally and I think on the eastern region website.

01:03:27.000 --> 01:03:39.000
And so this is it, it's called creating an educated democracy, and to do to a 656 is the course ID for it so if you want to look it up that's where to go.

01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:49.000
It's on five Wednesday evening. So starting 20th of April, 7pm, to 8:30pm.

01:03:49.000 --> 01:04:06.000
So if you would like to know a bit more about Williams and being a five session course, it allows me to expand a lot more to talk about some of these other works and some of these other ideas and some give you a much more complete picture of him.

01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:24.000
And indeed, you know what I'm interested in which is trying to explain to you what he meant by creating an educated democracy, because that's what I feel actually informs my attention with the W right that's what I'm trying to do, which is why I run so

01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:28.000
many courses ionic ism but that's another, that's another message.

01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:43.000
And, but that's it, that's the course so make a note if you're interested, see 2228656 go for that. Look for it. The, the Course Information shooting everything has been published.

01:04:43.000 --> 01:04:56.000
So enrollments are now open. And I will be working on producing the canvas to back that up shortly. So, no thank you Chad, so I can. Thanks very much for that.

Lecture

Lecture 91 - Pink or blue?: the socialisation of gender

Have you ever thought about why the colours pink and blue are associated with female and male identity? We are conditioned from birth to behave in a certain way acceptable to society’s binary norms but what impact does this have on self-identity within the gender continuum?

Join us to discover the history of gender association with colours such as pink and blue, and the Pride rainbow. We’ll look at the significance of the rainbow, widely used to represent the LGBTQI+ community and explore the symbolism behind it.

Video transcript

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:23.000
Welcome everyone, and thank you for having me back again that I really enjoyed the last letter again about pronouns, and there's going to be a bit of a recap on this lecture about gender and diversity, just so you get to sort by understanding of what

00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:48.000
to be talking about. So, I'm going to just share my screen and bring up the first slide. Can everyone see that Okay, that's good. Yeah, pink or blue, the socialization of gender, and it's a really interesting topic that I'm actually going to be writing

00:00:48.000 --> 00:01:01.000
a research paper on so I thought this is really good for me to be looking at it and sharing with you and sharing thoughts with you, and also for you to share your thoughts with me because we're going to be stopping so about halfway through and I'm going

00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:06.000
to ask you a question. And I'd really be interested in your thoughts on that as well.

00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:09.000
So

00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:32.000
it's LGBT q plus. History Month. And this lecture forms part of the history month so we'll be talking about the LGBT q pride flag, or flags. And we'll also be talking about the pink and blue socialization of gender and and the colors as well, but we see

00:01:32.000 --> 00:01:34.000
sort of all around us.

00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:48.000
regard to sort of the binary is male and female so we don't have a look at gender definition. So a quick recap on what that is. And then we're going to look at the history of incomplete clothing for young children.

00:01:48.000 --> 00:02:01.000
So, going back with our show you some examples of like art history, and things that you may remember as well. When you were children, or when you were bringing up your own children.

00:02:01.000 --> 00:02:18.000
Then you're going to have a look at the social construct and perform activity so some academic dialogue on why why this is happening, why is pink and blue what's the theory behind it.

00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:31.000
And then we're going to have a quick break and I'm going to be asking you some questions. And then, after that we'll have a look at the LGBTQ plus colours, and what those colours symbolize and what they mean.

00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:45.000
And I've also got some resources and further reading for you so if you're really interested in this subject you can reach out to and then we we have our usual q amp a section at the end.

00:02:45.000 --> 00:03:11.000
So it's gender. So, gender is about identity and expression of individuals so it's not necessarily about a sex or a male or female. It's actually about how people identify themselves so they can identify themselves internally as how they feel about themselves.

00:03:11.000 --> 00:03:22.000
So they could feel, male or I could feel female or they can feel a combination of both or neither because we're looking at this or that continuum or a spectrum of how you feel.

00:03:22.000 --> 00:03:38.000
And the other way, gender can be expressed as externally, so people or individuals can present themselves in a certain way. So with their clothing or hair or mannerisms so pull back the sort of external expression.

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:53.000
And then a few other terms, it's like sexual orientation. So sexual orientation is how you are attracted to someone physically. I think you have the sex, which is the anatomy, the physical anatomy.

00:03:53.000 --> 00:04:12.000
And I've got a diagram, I'm going to show you the French person, and this is quite a sort of simple way to understand how gender is represented and there's the academic term so it on the outside here on the left, you've got expression so that's externally

00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:14.000
how someone expresses themselves.

00:04:14.000 --> 00:04:32.000
Internally, you have identity up here in terms of the brain, and how people feel. And then, orientation sexual orientation, you have the heart so it's how are you how are you attracted to someone, are you attracted to men women male female or not attracted

00:04:32.000 --> 00:04:44.000
to anybody. And then we have the physical, the six. So we're looking at the anatomy the biology here. So that's quite an easy way to remember it.

00:04:44.000 --> 00:05:04.000
So, if we look at the history of pink and blue the colours that are used throughout history when we're doing this because we are surrounded at the moment with these pink for girls and blue for boys, we have that sort of like lived experience of a certain

00:05:04.000 --> 00:05:20.000
amount of bias when we're looking at these images. So, although you're looking at the images you may automatically say well why is that baby wearing pink, why is it Why is that that's not right you know but you got to think about all you are seeing images

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:30.000
around you that are affecting how you feel about different images that you're going to be seeing so it'd be interesting to discuss that further when we have our break.

00:05:30.000 --> 00:05:49.000
So, the history of pink and blue in the middle age is there a lot of images of Mary and Madonna with blue, and for this image here which is from 1390 Italian that peau de de ma Co.

00:05:49.000 --> 00:05:56.000
This cloak here is actually blue but his faded over time, because it was made from.

00:05:56.000 --> 00:06:13.000
It just check my notes, it was made from. As you're right so the pigment as your I compared to ultra Marine, as you're right faded over time so this would have been really bright blue when it was first painted so we're looking at the blue or female, and

00:06:13.000 --> 00:06:21.000
then we're looking at the red here. This is Christ red for Christ so it's totally the opposite of what we received today.

00:06:21.000 --> 00:06:37.000
And if you look at the symbolism of this blue represented purity divine virtue, and then the red represented, lots of different things but you could say that it represented martyrdom.

00:06:37.000 --> 00:06:43.000
And Christ blood, so we can see that the bread of the baby here.

00:06:43.000 --> 00:07:00.000
Another example we have of in the Middle Ages, is the virgin child here again in a red outfit, and Mary in blue and this time is a much brighter blue because it's been paid out of.

00:07:00.000 --> 00:07:16.000
This is the 1400, and this collection. If you're interested in looking at RP go to the National Gallery website you can actually go and search all their collections and you can see all the images of their paintings, if you're interested in doing that.

00:07:16.000 --> 00:07:34.000
The, the reason behind the symbolism of pink and blue, and where it originally came from it is all in the Middle Ages anyway, is related to this, or humour's, and I know that I think it was last year, we had a lecture about the four humours so that whether

00:07:34.000 --> 00:07:56.000
whether you can think back to that lecture and it was talking about these four elements the fire and water. And these represented and different colours and the different elements so we're looking at, air, which is at the top here, and then you're looking

00:07:56.000 --> 00:08:09.000
at fire, which is represented by red, which is blood. It is hot. And if you look at the inner circle here you can see manhood is on the inner circle near read.

00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:39.000
And if we have a look over at Blue, we have that represents, water, and it represents the area for for blue so it's cold and it's wet, whereas fire is hot and it's warm so we looked at Christ being warm, this is the fire.

00:08:53.000 --> 00:09:05.000
it's called medieval bodies. I don't know if anyone's come across this is by jack Hartnell. And that's really interesting read and that talks about the body and the different.

00:09:05.000 --> 00:09:12.000
The humans and the elements of the body as well.

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:21.000
So if we're moving on to the 1600s, we come across these very elaborate clothing here that people will.

00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:38.000
And we have a Dutch painter called your Hannah's Cornelius best Bronk, and you can see we've got a pink outfit with a blue cloak. So we have we don't have the agenda pink and blue norms as we see today.

00:09:38.000 --> 00:09:48.000
And then also if we move on, we have a saint by the same artist, 1641, a young girl in a blue dress.

00:09:48.000 --> 00:10:09.000
And this is an interesting one. This is American folk art about 1840 and it's from the Honolulu Museum of Art, and this is a boy in a pink dress. So we're looking at pink being used in four boys and four girls this is no sort of like discrimination.

00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:23.000
We also looking at dresses dresses were worn by boys and girls. So a gender neutral really everyone more dresses up until the age of about six, seven, and also the majority of young children, or white.

00:10:23.000 --> 00:10:37.000
So this is an example of someone who would be quite wealthy because they could afford to have a color but most young white. And the reason for that is because it was easy to clean, and if it was marks on it you could just bleach it so you didn't have

00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:53.000
of this pink for boys pink for girls and blue for boys when the children were born, it was all sort of like very gender neutral colours and.

00:10:53.000 --> 00:11:08.000
Another example is the Victorian so this is a Victorian birthday card so on this card you can see that the little girl is in a blue dress and the boy is in a red sort of run proceed here.

00:11:08.000 --> 00:11:25.000
So, again, there's there's no discrimination between these colours being fixed in terms of squares what it's just a picture of a Victorian card. And you can see those role reversal colours there.

00:11:25.000 --> 00:11:38.000
And 1800 1900, we're looking at Franklin Roosevelt here so you might look at that today and think, oh, that's not Franklin Roosevelt that must be a girl.

00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:58.000
She's got little shoes on patent leather shoes. got a white dress on a long hair, but at that time, the girls and the boys was very similar clothes and outfits so to say it was very gender neutral but if we're looking at this now because we've had all

00:11:58.000 --> 00:12:14.000
the exposure to the different colours that we're seeing today in the shops and what babies aware and we look at this, it doesn't it doesn't necessarily sit by with us as well.

00:12:14.000 --> 00:12:34.000
1900s. So it's interesting to think about what you know why do you just suddenly change what happened.

00:12:34.000 --> 00:12:46.000
that that young children look on TV, they're very much role related and related to the to the binaries.

00:12:46.000 --> 00:13:03.000
We have a look at my eye contact it, politics, Toy Museum. I think this, we have to lecture about politics, which was last summer. And some of you may have been attended that lecture I know that people don't like looking at those then sort of look away

00:13:03.000 --> 00:13:23.000
but I contacted them, and I was talking about the use of gender based clothing for dolls and Debbie brown who's a creator there said that the most dollars were just dressed in the traditional long white clothes that you can see this image here so there

00:13:23.000 --> 00:13:42.000
was no such thing called Blue, and she said that there's a few male dolls, and there's a baby dog Doreen, and during dates from the 1930s and Doreen is dressed in a pink knitted outfit.

00:13:42.000 --> 00:14:00.000
Unfortunately I don't have a photograph of Dory. But it's interesting that the dolls that the children played with also replicated what the children were burying at that time.

00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:11.000
But we move on to the 1900s it's interesting to have a look at what's happening in America, because in 1927 and Time Magazine.

00:14:11.000 --> 00:14:33.000
We have a short piece about clothing for boys and girls. And they, the idea is I think for boy because pink was usually used for boys and blue was used for girls, and there's a table at the bottom here showing what type of whatever areas that are geographical

00:14:33.000 --> 00:14:44.000
areas in America and what colours we use so this is in 1927 so so after the First World War. So, we're looking at.

00:14:44.000 --> 00:15:02.000
Manhattan, you've got the different department stores here. And also, at that time in America, there were these some magazines or trade magazines that were sent out to all the houses and residents and people could order things on these in these capitals.

00:15:02.000 --> 00:15:21.000
So here we're saying in Manhattan, at best, think was usually used for boys and girls had blue, clothing, and it may says it was blue for boys, and pink for girls that if you're looking down here in Los Angeles.

00:15:21.000 --> 00:15:37.000
It was blue for boys pink for those.

00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:53.000
colour for boys or girls is a mixture of it, and that was 1927. So, you see that we're looking through the ages of a history and we haven't really come to any decision as to what colour was about to

00:15:53.000 --> 00:16:11.000
move forward to buy the 1960s and 1970s. I don't know whether you still have you here. Do you remember these sort of patterns because I remember as a child, my, my mom used to make a lot of our clothes because we didn't we couldn't really afford to buy

00:16:11.000 --> 00:16:20.000
clothes and also they weren't. It wasn't the availability of clothes that we find these days and in places like prime mark on next.

00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:34.000
And so, this is examples of some some patterns and you see these sorts of gender neutral wrong pursuits. And then again in the 1970s which is on the left here, you've got these again so gender neutral trousers suits.

00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:38.000
And we have the

00:16:38.000 --> 00:17:02.000
blue or, or, or red or yellow. But in the 1960s and 70s. Those of you that, remember, making these outfits for your own children. 60s and 70s was the introduction of the second wave feminism so you had people like Betty Friedan who wrote the feminine

00:17:02.000 --> 00:17:20.000
mystique, and they were talking about freedom and emancipation of women women getting out of the house and being able to work, and not being having to stay at home and behind the kitchen sink, and it was all about very much about freedom and emancipation.

00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:35.000
And these clothes of gender neutral clothes, sort of reflected what was happening in society at that time. And so it's interesting to associate that was what was happening in feminism, and that's what made me think well what.

00:17:35.000 --> 00:17:55.000
Now, and we were sort of like we're feminism has moved along further and further in terms of equality and, but we seem to have gone and started using things like nappies for example, a disposable nappies, we've got the boys nappies and the girls nappies.

00:17:55.000 --> 00:18:05.000
And these were introduced in the 1990s like Pampers, so you can see the poison that piece of gossip like, things like that. And the girls teddy bears and.

00:18:05.000 --> 00:18:24.000
So, we started to see this in the 1990s, and this wasn't related to feminism on top because of the feminism at that time, certainly wasn't restricted to trying to make women go down in certain roles, so the feminine feminine way women staying at home

00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:27.000
and not working.

00:18:27.000 --> 00:18:31.000
It was very much

00:18:31.000 --> 00:18:33.000
in terms of feminism.

00:18:33.000 --> 00:18:45.000
It was more advanced it was people wanting to be equal rather than just swimming being equally was everyone's being equal, and looking at how society can be equal as a whole.

00:18:45.000 --> 00:19:00.000
So, 1990s when we start looking at these colours being introduced the pink and the blue for boys and girls. And then, When we look at today so in 2022.

00:19:00.000 --> 00:19:16.000
There was something recently in the news I don't know whether you saw it about prime okay said prime what we're being accused of selling hugely sexist, kids clothes, and these are some examples of clothes that they had on their website.

00:19:16.000 --> 00:19:33.000
So, for example, you had a girl's sweatshirt in pink and it said dream. And can you have a boys sweatshirt in blue and it says fearless so you think about those words fearless is a boat.

00:19:33.000 --> 00:19:45.000
It's an active word, where stream is, if you think of a girl. You'll tell you telling a girl that they can dream but they can never actually do anything.

00:19:45.000 --> 00:19:51.000
They just got to sit there and dream about it, whereas a boy you're saying to them you're you're fearless you can do anything you want in life.

00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:54.000
And you look down the bottom here.

00:19:54.000 --> 00:20:12.000
We have never hold back this is a boys t shirt. So say two boys your fears Don't hold back, you could do anything you want to, whereas girls dream about it you can smile, bright and happy and have a lovely smile on your face, but you know, you need to

00:20:12.000 --> 00:20:15.000
hold back your girl you were pink.

00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:31.000
And that's how you are you're not like boys you can play with pink clothes, Barbie dolls, and anything that's pink. You can watch princess some frozen Disney films but remember your girl so as long as you smile everyone will like you.

00:20:31.000 --> 00:20:36.000
And so, this is this is 2022. And I find it.

00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:56.000
I find that we seem to have sort of reverted and go back to a period where women didn't have equality and it's interesting to, to find out whether this is just being accepted as normal, or whether this is something that people are going to be starting

00:20:56.000 --> 00:21:11.000
to talk about or discuss and, and also challenging. So, in response to this prime Mark said that there's a broad range of styles across the kids clothing and they're catering for mixed tastes.

00:21:11.000 --> 00:21:23.000
And they said, in recent times they've removed gender specific labels. However, I don't feel that these are gender neutral. These clothing that is here.

00:21:23.000 --> 00:21:32.000
And they're also saying that they're always learning so we welcome customer feedback so it's good that they welcome customer feedback but these items are still on their website.

00:21:32.000 --> 00:21:38.000
And I also had a look at. Next, and they have got several items on their website as well.

00:21:38.000 --> 00:21:51.000
And then I had to walk around Northridge the other week and took some photographs.

00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:58.000
Those baby clothes in pink. So it's quite striking that

00:21:58.000 --> 00:22:06.000
this is evident today, whereas I certainly don't remember it when I was younger or when even when I was bringing up my children.

00:22:06.000 --> 00:22:22.000
There's also something else that is started in the 2000s that has come across from America and they called baby gender reveal party is I don't know whether anyone's heard about these, but what the Americans do and what is coming over into this country

00:22:22.000 --> 00:22:43.000
as well, is that before a baby's born, the parents will have a scan done, and told what sex the babies, so they will then have a party, invite all their friends and families, before the baby's born and do a big surprise party with the colors represented.

00:22:43.000 --> 00:22:57.000
And the change of their baby but their, their friends and family have to guess what sex it is. And if they guess right you have these things like this is this is blue feathers here that will coming out of the box so it's a really big thing in America

00:22:57.000 --> 00:22:59.000
is gender reveal party is.

00:22:59.000 --> 00:23:15.000
When I first heard about gender and I thought, Oh, that's a nice idea I thought it was about people being able to talk about the agenda in terms of LGBT q i also love the idea to have an agenda reveal party and then I realized oh no it's not.

00:23:15.000 --> 00:23:33.000
It's actually people having a party before the baby's born and actually determining the colours the colours of this binary male, female, pink, blue, a fist baby before, before the babies even born.

00:23:33.000 --> 00:23:54.000
So, I wanted to ask you and this is where Fiona is going to pop in and awesome just pause for a moment I want to ask you, or why do you think colours of change to the pink and blue stereotypes that we see today, because it is very, it's only very recent

00:23:54.000 --> 00:24:10.000
this has happened. And some of you may remember back to when you have at your children or grandchildren and I said I remember as a child and having my children they didn't seem to be so extreme as it is now.

00:24:10.000 --> 00:24:15.000
So I'm going to show a stop sharing, Fiona.

00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:27.000
Yeah. Stop shooting for a little minute and if people want to put their comments, and what they think the answers to that question into the, into the chat, and we can we can talk through some of them.

00:24:27.000 --> 00:24:30.000
So we'll give you a little minute to do that.

00:24:30.000 --> 00:24:48.000
Why do you think these colors of change to the pink and blue. They used to be gender, gender neutral colors for young children and babies. So why do you think this might have changed.

00:24:48.000 --> 00:25:00.000
Okay, so like few comments coming in there and power of the media Barbies. It's all to do with marketing.

00:25:00.000 --> 00:25:06.000
And yet, a lot of the comments that are coming in, is around that the actual marketing.

00:25:06.000 --> 00:25:11.000
Not sure if I a girl can't buy a blue top or vice versa, surely no difference.

00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:24.000
Eg no buttons doing up opposite sides and shirts, because you do see that don't you address the buttons and zips and things a lot marketing is a really good point.

00:25:24.000 --> 00:25:25.000
Yeah.

00:25:25.000 --> 00:25:28.000
And I'll come on to that and the next slide.

00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:34.000
easier to categorize for consumer stick purposes.

00:25:34.000 --> 00:25:39.000
Yeah.

00:25:39.000 --> 00:25:41.000
Yeah.

00:25:41.000 --> 00:25:48.000
It seems to be marketing and advertising so that kind of accord with your thoughts on it Rachel.

00:25:48.000 --> 00:25:50.000
Yes.

00:25:50.000 --> 00:25:54.000
Pink Pink fairies on TV. Yes.

00:25:54.000 --> 00:26:06.000
And and also way, if you think about someone in the chat has talked about missing baby clothes and it was all very gender neutral colors I lemon and whites and cream.

00:26:06.000 --> 00:26:16.000
And also, just some of you remember making clothes for your children using those patterns that were again sort of gender neutral.

00:26:16.000 --> 00:26:18.000
I'm talking about.

00:26:18.000 --> 00:26:21.000
We got here, commercialism.

00:26:21.000 --> 00:26:44.000
When is it, there's just a quick question here that we could maybe answer no since we're talking about this is a very very quick question from Andrew, Alexander, you said it was quite recently that this pink and blue binary thing came along.

00:26:44.000 --> 00:26:55.000
It then leads over to this country so we were talking about it, mentioned about the nappies that the Pampers nappies girls nappies and boys nappies with the different colours on them.

00:26:55.000 --> 00:27:04.000
And I didn't I didn't use disposal on that piece I use cloth nappies and I will just like white.

00:27:04.000 --> 00:27:14.000
But it is again, it's about. Suppose selling selling more nappies that they said all the girls nappies are different, because they had the boys.

00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:20.000
When do you use cloth nappies it's always actually the same.

00:27:20.000 --> 00:27:33.000
So yes so I started 1990s in America and then move over here. And as we're seeing now in sort by the 2020s we're seeing these gender reveal party shark and American.

00:27:33.000 --> 00:27:47.000
Bear in mind that we are talking about Western culture. We only talking about Western culture with these colous, and in terms of the babies and the young, young children, it's Western culture alone yeah there's a few people saying about you know the reason

00:27:47.000 --> 00:28:00.000
I was asking that is there's a few people saying about kind of remembering the pink and blue thing from a bit earlier than that. And in the 50s and 60s perhaps.

00:28:00.000 --> 00:28:18.000
It may have been a bit earlier but the the research I've done said it was mostly in the 1990s because in the 50s 60s, there were more gender neutral colors and the babies lot babies were just fess up like white or black fitted clothes but it should be

00:28:18.000 --> 00:28:20.000
why to let them.

00:28:20.000 --> 00:28:36.000
And also, in the 1970s, when there was that push back against what's been happening in the in the 50s with women told to stay at home and not work then we have this pretty much sort of like gender neutral posing as well.

00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:41.000
And the, The young girls and children wearing trousers seats.

00:28:41.000 --> 00:28:54.000
Yeah. And just sits in the other interesting comments we've got lots of comments which obviously I'll pass on to you afterwards and Mitchell.

00:28:54.000 --> 00:29:09.000
I just thought there's a comment there by Jill Arnold about there's no evidence that children naturally favour one colour. Well when when babies are born, then they don't favorite color because they don't have any choice what they've been in today.

00:29:09.000 --> 00:29:25.000
And so, the same with young, young babies and young children, the clothes are bought by their parents and their parents or grandparents will dress them in certain clothing so they don't really have a choice but if they they favor one color or the answer

00:29:25.000 --> 00:29:38.000
will because they're surrounded by these colors and now I'll go into that now. So if I just share my screen here, of course, thanks, thanks very much for all your comments folks we will certainly be taking these away afterwards.

00:29:38.000 --> 00:29:43.000
Just

00:29:43.000 --> 00:30:02.000
share my screen, and hopefully everyone can see that. So, when we talking about will children naturally favour, different colours that the theory behind this is all about gender social construction so when a baby is born.

00:30:02.000 --> 00:30:21.000
They don't have any have any favourite colours, so they put in colours by their parents by their clothing, and just the way that parents will treat the children as well in terms of the words that they're using and the descriptions and the toys that they

00:30:21.000 --> 00:30:23.000
buy. So, I think.

00:30:23.000 --> 00:30:42.000
Lots of people mentioned that consumerism and the pink and blue consumerism is in fact reinforcing and imposing this binary plan it seems to be going backwards rather than being progressive and looking forward, and it's normalizing gender as a binary

00:30:42.000 --> 00:31:01.000
construction so we are talking about gender roles, being created or constructed by a society. So when you're born you don't have any preference over your gender role but you see everything a young baby sees what's happening around it and he absorbs everything.

00:31:01.000 --> 00:31:21.000
And then so it sees young children will see their peers, wearing pink girls and the boys will see a boy is wearing blue with the slogans on their t shirts saying fearless and things like that so it's about what happened in society, and it's about this

00:31:21.000 --> 00:31:40.000
performative city and this construction of what people can see. And so, we have a well known academic Judith Butler who wrote in 1990, that we act in ways that consolidate the impression of building a man or a woman so when you're born.

00:31:40.000 --> 00:31:46.000
You can be born male or female, but you don't start to

00:31:46.000 --> 00:31:55.000
express yourself as male or female, what is this all about what happens around you, what the environments like as to how you express yourself.

00:31:55.000 --> 00:32:11.000
And then we have Iris, Marion young in 1980 wrote a book about throwing like a girl, and she said that girls are physically inhibited can find positions and objectified.

00:32:11.000 --> 00:32:21.000
So we're looking at when babies are born, they and they start going through their to their preschool they see what they watch TV.

00:32:21.000 --> 00:32:33.000
They bought clothes that they're wearing. And there they are, they automatically assume that they can dream and they can smile and they can look pretty because that's what they should be doing that's what's acceptable by society.

00:32:33.000 --> 00:32:40.000
I'm not saying this happens to all parents do this but it's what we see around us all the time.

00:32:40.000 --> 00:32:57.000
And Joe paralytic in 2012 that was written a book about this pink, blue, and she said that it could have gone the other way so I'm really looking at so like the 1990s it could have gone the other way so there's no, there's no logical rationale for why

00:32:57.000 --> 00:33:10.000
there was this color shift and why children are continuing to use white but then why it isn't of these days it's not a very practical color for for young children and babies to wear so that's probably why why it wasn't continued to be used, but there

00:33:10.000 --> 00:33:26.000
other colors you like green, yellow, but yet, Joe has written. Another academic has written articles and books about it there's no logical reason for this to happen, which is why I sort of like pose that question to you, to see what do you think about

00:33:26.000 --> 00:33:30.000
why you think that might have been a reason for it.

00:33:30.000 --> 00:33:36.000
And I can see that most of you are saying that there's a lot about consumerism because

00:33:36.000 --> 00:33:48.000
if things are selling as a pink bicycle for will be sold for young girls.

00:33:48.000 --> 00:34:03.000
Then there's more pink bicycles as soon as a young girl sees a pink bicycle they'll say oh I want that because they're being used to wearing pink their clothes are pink the same smile be happy they want to thank you Bobby bicycle.

00:34:03.000 --> 00:34:14.000
And then the same with the boys, if they're saying, if you're looking at a toy shop and you have a look at the Lego. Most of the Lego is. Although go, obviously.

00:34:14.000 --> 00:34:25.000
Any child complaint with yet Lego but when you look at the Lego in the on the shelf you have, as soon as it gets just like girls like pink.

00:34:25.000 --> 00:34:39.000
And you've got houses and houses and there shouldn't I don't feel there should be any reason why should it be pink me let me look outside and we don't see pink houses three houses have brown.

00:34:39.000 --> 00:34:54.000
They've got fast moves or they're white, we don't see that that we don't see pink houses, whereas when you look at the Lego for Star Wars, for example, it's the actual colours that are in the film which is like the grays and the browns.

00:34:54.000 --> 00:35:15.000
So, these academics are talking about how the agenda roles are constructed so being constructed by society by us by consumers. And so we're all up to blame really for for what what is this happening at the moment.

00:35:15.000 --> 00:35:28.000
I'm going to move on to the LGBT q pride colours, that's represented here so the LGBT Q

00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:31.000
pride as being LGBT Q.

00:35:31.000 --> 00:35:53.000
History Month at the moment. Each of these colors represents a certain element, and the pride rainbow flag was again designed in the US came over from the US by Gilbert Baker, in 1978, and there's a symbol for the LGBT community.

00:35:53.000 --> 00:35:57.000
So, we have the rainbow colour starting with the red.

00:35:57.000 --> 00:36:04.000
That represents life. And then you have the orange healing. You have the sunlight of the yellow.

00:36:04.000 --> 00:36:18.000
And then you have nature, which is green. You got peace, blue and spirit, which is the violence or purple so I'm thinking about these colors if you go back to what I was talking about earlier.

00:36:18.000 --> 00:36:32.000
In this lecture we were talking about the child and Madonna was nearly always represented with Blue.

00:36:32.000 --> 00:36:39.000
And then, we're talking about the red which in some cases which Christ was wearing red we're talking about life.

00:36:39.000 --> 00:36:56.000
So, if we're looking at these colours here in the rainbow is also we can go back in time to the history of civilization civilization of colours and right back to those for humans to see how these colours are now use a sort of present day.

00:36:56.000 --> 00:37:02.000
So, the rainbow in history has symbolized harmony.

00:37:02.000 --> 00:37:12.000
It's hope. So when you have Noah's Ark Noah's Ark. I see this rainbow and as a sign of hope that there's going to be land on the rise and so it's like dreams hope.

00:37:12.000 --> 00:37:26.000
It's a promise of a better future and new beginnings as well, but it's also meant to represent solidarity and equality. So, this flag

00:37:26.000 --> 00:37:45.000
from America in 1978 But since then, there were some of you aware but we have a new flag, and which first started in 2018. And then in 2021 it was, it was altered slightly so we have this new flag and it's called the pride progress flag.

00:37:45.000 --> 00:37:49.000
And this has additional

00:37:49.000 --> 00:38:08.000
symbolism, added to the first LGBT q plus flag so we have the colours on the right hand side here which are the same as the previous slide, but also we have the black and the brown colours here and an arrow which represent people of colour.

00:38:08.000 --> 00:38:23.000
Then we have the blue and the pink and the white here, which represent trans. And then we also have this yellow triangle with the purple oval shape here which represents intersex.

00:38:23.000 --> 00:38:40.000
So those of you who are not familiar with intersects intersected intersex is neither male or female is all fits in in the in the middle there. So, in terms of biology someone who's intersex can have female and male biological organs.

00:38:40.000 --> 00:38:58.000
So, the flag that most people might see now is this new flag which you've got you've got an arrow here which, as you can see that the point of the, the black and the brown arrow pointing to the right and this represents progression and moving forward.

00:38:58.000 --> 00:39:04.000
And in 2021 this was designed this new fad here with the.

00:39:04.000 --> 00:39:23.000
the intersects section was designed by Valentino machete, and the pride progress flag was Daniel Quasar. So, I'm going to give you some quotes from Daniel just for the reasons why flag change.

00:39:23.000 --> 00:39:34.000
So, what he was saying is that they the arrow points to the right to show sort of like a forward movement, and to illustrate progress, and more progress still needs to be made.

00:39:34.000 --> 00:39:52.000
And he also says that this new design forces the viewer to reflect on their own feelings towards the original pride flag so a lot of us are used to seeing this rainbow colors of the original pride flag but LGBT q plus community and looking more outwards

00:39:52.000 --> 00:40:04.000
and being more inclusive by adding people of color and trans people and then intersects as well. So, the original pride flag has been developed further.

00:40:04.000 --> 00:40:18.000
So Daniel saying that there's different opinions on what the flag really means. But it needs to be bringing it into clear focus about the current needs within our community so we're talking about currently is.

00:40:18.000 --> 00:40:33.000
22 about what society, it is, this is, again, is in Western culture society in Western culture, and what it represents.

00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:46.000
Got some slides here with some resources on for you so there's a really good website called the LGBT q history month so if you want to find out more about LGBT q plus his website, go to.

00:40:46.000 --> 00:40:51.000
And there's the article there about the prime mark.

00:40:51.000 --> 00:41:00.000
And the sexist kids clothes. And there's also Stonewall that you can go to and find some information about LGBT Q.

00:41:00.000 --> 00:41:17.000
There's some further reading so I've got books here, and I know that Fiona is going to make the presentation available so there's some further reading there some books I was talking about but then Hartnell and young as well throwing like a girl so if

00:41:17.000 --> 00:41:23.000
you're interested in reading more about the theories behind this. Then there's there's some further reading to do.

00:41:23.000 --> 00:41:36.000
And there are also some courses that I'm doing coming up for the weekend. So on Saturday we have started the conversation using gender neutral pronouns which some of you might have been attended for the lectures.

00:41:36.000 --> 00:41:50.000
And then on the Sunday, we've got the pink or blue, and it's in a, although I'll be including some of the material from this lecture be more discussion based there'd be lots of opportunities.

00:41:50.000 --> 00:42:06.000
And then, please see the woman's body subjugation oppression which will be an interesting topic so I've got those ones coming up. And as moving on to q amp a open question time.

00:42:06.000 --> 00:42:19.000
I'm going to pass over to Fiona, and that's let's say thank you very much for listening to me and I'm having a look at the the chat here to answer some of your questions.

00:42:19.000 --> 00:42:32.000
So I'm just going to stop sharing so right Fiona. Yeah, that's absolutely fine. Thanks very much for that Rachel that was, that was really interesting right I'm going to just launch into some questions I need to scroll up so we've had lots and lots of

00:42:32.000 --> 00:42:34.000
comments which is fantastic.

00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:49.000
And no, let me see. I'm just going to sort of start from the top, basically, am right there with me, everybody.

00:42:49.000 --> 00:43:05.000
Right. It was a question from make and it's when you were sort of talking about that the history of of the sort of colours, and he's asking why is all about pink and blue did people never were other colours.

00:43:05.000 --> 00:43:13.000
Um, people wore other colours. If you look at, look, I'm talking about sort of like babies and young children.

00:43:13.000 --> 00:43:17.000
Prior to the 1990s.

00:43:17.000 --> 00:43:20.000
General lots of different colours were used.

00:43:20.000 --> 00:43:38.000
So more gender neutral colours but it's not until recently, this pink, blue, has been more dominant as colours for male and female young children, and it's just interesting to find out why this is the case that considering where we think that we're more

00:43:38.000 --> 00:43:47.000
more progressive we look at the price flag and we are we're, we're really progressive we've, we've added extra colours to the pride flag to show how inclusive we are.

00:43:47.000 --> 00:43:53.000
Whereas, we're going backwards a step backwards in terms of how we're addressing children.

00:43:53.000 --> 00:44:00.000
And what how we're talking to our children and what toys they're playing with and what they're watching on TV.

00:44:00.000 --> 00:44:07.000
Okay. And, okay. A question from gene.

00:44:07.000 --> 00:44:17.000
And it's when you were talking about those patterns that you got you know those sort of kids, and the patterns, and you could still see the girls and blue.

00:44:17.000 --> 00:44:20.000
I think it was going back into the 50s and 60s.

00:44:20.000 --> 00:44:22.000
Could the blue have been denim.

00:44:22.000 --> 00:44:26.000
which I guess is unisex.

00:44:26.000 --> 00:44:32.000
Yeah, denim is a unisex Yeah.

00:44:32.000 --> 00:44:37.000
And there's also damage, it can be other colours content can be black and.

00:44:37.000 --> 00:44:38.000
Yeah.

00:44:38.000 --> 00:44:39.000
Okay.

00:44:39.000 --> 00:44:51.000
Um, a question from Sue, actually this is a really interesting one. What is the norm, and other cultures and Diana Harvey was also asking, you know, a similar question.

00:44:51.000 --> 00:45:12.000
What about in the Far East, for example, how do we see these kinds of this kind of binary kind of pink and blue thing happening and other cultures, we don't we don't tend to see this as much which is why as I emphasize this is a Western culture, because

00:45:12.000 --> 00:45:23.000
we're talking about consumerism as well, and the western capitalist culture of consumerism and if you look at the Far East, if you look at.

00:45:23.000 --> 00:45:26.000
If you look at Afghanistan as an example.

00:45:26.000 --> 00:45:30.000
The women in Afghanistan, often wear.

00:45:30.000 --> 00:45:50.000
What is most popular colour is black, and then you can also see the dark blue. And it's totally different culture to the Western culture in terms of what is available to buy in the shops and what is available for clothing what's available for books, and

00:45:50.000 --> 00:46:07.000
what's available for for toys, we, we think we have a choice, we haven't big choice but if you go to your local JoJo, my mom, baby I think that's who they are, and I'm going there want to buy something for a grandchild.

00:46:07.000 --> 00:46:17.000
You just got in front of you, you just got the pink and blue there well I don't think I would just buy something, gender neutral you don't have a lot of choice so we think we've got choice when we haven't actually.

00:46:17.000 --> 00:46:24.000
I think that's something that we need to do we need to change that we need to challenge that.

00:46:24.000 --> 00:46:25.000
Okay.

00:46:25.000 --> 00:46:35.000
And a question from Sylvia. Now this is talking about the pride flag and the change the recent change to the flag.

00:46:35.000 --> 00:46:47.000
And so he's asking quite that the flag needs to be amended the words life healing, except a couple of people of every color and religion surely does it need to be explained and expanded.

00:46:47.000 --> 00:47:08.000
That's an interesting question because the the pride flag was created in the 1970s. And if you think back about feminism feminism, and in the 1970s 60s and 70s was presumably predominantly white women.

00:47:08.000 --> 00:47:26.000
If you look at Greenham common there was white women. So, what the the pride movement has looked at and reflected on is that we don't, they don't want to be represented as white Western pride in got to include everybody regardless of who they are.

00:47:26.000 --> 00:47:38.000
So, which is why we have those additional colours, and it's reflected in what we what we do in society today as well in Western society.

00:47:38.000 --> 00:47:39.000
Yeah.

00:47:39.000 --> 00:47:41.000
Interesting.

00:47:41.000 --> 00:47:58.000
Okay. No, we've got a little bit of time here, and noting was actually asking whether you could maybe say a little bit about gender neutral pronouns, just know because we've probably got some people on the lecture today that weren't around, and on the

00:47:58.000 --> 00:48:14.000
previous one, that you did on this. And I don't know whether you can maybe talk a little bit about the gender neutral pronouns that we have no gender, inclusive pronouns, as they and them.

00:48:14.000 --> 00:48:35.000
So, if you are me not for my, my name and zoom for example I've put my pronouns which is she in her, which are the pronouns that I use. And so some people may not use those pronouns, they may use the and them, and if you see someone, especially if you're

00:48:35.000 --> 00:48:48.000
in a zoom session and you see someone who's got the them pronouns, it means they want to be identified as gender neutral and they don't want to be referred to as he or she they want to refer to as they.

00:48:48.000 --> 00:49:10.000
So it's about respecting someone's identity and and being so respectful unkind to everybody. And you might find that them you come across more people now in the media, who refer to their identity as they are them so it's something that a lot of young

00:49:10.000 --> 00:49:30.000
people are questioning at the moment as well so the figures also one in 10, young people identify as gender neutral in terms of the them pronouns, so that's something that you would be, could come across perhaps with your, your children or grandchildren,

00:49:30.000 --> 00:49:44.000
that you can have a discussion with without feeling that you aren't you don't have the knowledge or you're not aware or haven't heard of these that you know the pronouns before.

00:49:44.000 --> 00:49:53.000
Yeah. Okay, now I'm just trying to find another wasn't so much question it was more comment that I thought was really interesting. Hold on one second.

00:49:53.000 --> 00:50:03.000
And, yeah, this was a comment from Linda what ends up that you don't mind me mentioning this one. And it's coming back to sort of coming back to sort of gender stereotypes.

00:50:03.000 --> 00:50:15.000
And that is the CD that the freeze Boys Don't Cry have led to many issues with mental well being and the higher levels of suicide and men, especially young man, this man way to express emotions.

00:50:15.000 --> 00:50:19.000
I don't know if you've got any thoughts around that.

00:50:19.000 --> 00:50:34.000
No, I remember when my oldest was at school and, and I had, there was something happened to the primary school, I had to go in and add a discussion with the head teacher, and he just said to me Oh boys will be boys.

00:50:34.000 --> 00:50:49.000
And so I looked at him and I thought, What are you talking about boys will be boys. And I just thought it was such an awful thing to say, Oh, it's an excuse boys can go fight and bully each other because they're Boys, boys, girls can be girl so that they

00:50:49.000 --> 00:51:06.000
wouldn't be allowed to do that type of thing in the playground. So, isn't it is excusing their behaviour. So yes it is there's a lot of people still think like that so if people think that you to if you show kindness, or you should have feelings that's

00:51:06.000 --> 00:51:06.000
a sign of weakness.

00:51:06.000 --> 00:51:26.000
of weakness. And that's where I was coach coming to when I was talking about the prime up, clothing, and the the male and female stereotypes on there and the wording wordings that are used on that clothing for boys, for example, be brave and fearless

00:51:26.000 --> 00:51:41.000
girls smile and be kind. So, I mean I hopefully that the people that are here now when you're thinking, next time you thinking about buying clothes for your children or your grandchildren you look at these look online at by Marco and when you go into

00:51:41.000 --> 00:51:46.000
the IP coming up and and probably aren't going to buy something new.

00:51:46.000 --> 00:52:01.000
There's not going to have all these words on it but the pink smile. Are you gonna have a look at for a really good t shirt, it's got a track to order and it's green and you're going to give it to your granddaughter, you know, so you do something, you

00:52:01.000 --> 00:52:09.000
can challenge this as well. And I think you might be I mean I'm going to that situation life where I've got grandchildren, but I'm just thinking.

00:52:09.000 --> 00:52:20.000
When I have grandchildren and daughter in law and dresses the child in baby pink over time, I would probably find it quite difficult. So why would intervene.

00:52:20.000 --> 00:52:34.000
But then, I probably be told that I'm interfering so it's quite difficult isn't it because you can buy when the grandchildren come to you, you can dress them in what you think is is appropriate, but when they go home then.

00:52:34.000 --> 00:52:49.000
It's quite a different story and then it could, you could end up in a few arguments with family, but I think you do have to challenge. These, these binaries and you have to think about the welfare of the children as well and the girls need to be brave

00:52:49.000 --> 00:53:00.000
and they need to be fearless just as much as, boys, was like my little niece, and my two year old niece she wears her big brother's hand me downs. So yes, yeah.

00:53:00.000 --> 00:53:06.000
And now we've got another comment here so got a few minutes, and this is from Louisa.

00:53:06.000 --> 00:53:18.000
And there's a huge gender stereotyping in ways that restrict people have both sexes. When the trans conflicts with so much less if we went to binary in first place.

00:53:18.000 --> 00:53:21.000
Chase then comment.

00:53:21.000 --> 00:53:24.000
I'm

00:53:24.000 --> 00:53:27.000
sorry I was looking at the chat Can you repeat that please.

00:53:27.000 --> 00:53:43.000
Yeah, so, and Louisa was saying there is a huge, gender, there's huge gender stereotyping in ways that restrict people both sexes. And when the trans conflict, be so much less if we weren't so binary in the first place.

00:53:43.000 --> 00:54:00.000
Yeah, that is true that and that's what we're trying to work towards in terms of our Western culture and society, especially with the example of that pride flag, but you got to think about if we're very fortunate in this country and in the Western society.

00:54:00.000 --> 00:54:12.000
And there's other countries across the world that don't have that freedom. And for example, we've got the Winter Olympics at the moment in China, and our athletes have been told.

00:54:12.000 --> 00:54:28.000
Do not talk about anything regarding net gender or anything contentious, and the same if any sports are happening in Russia. Then again, they have to be have to be really careful athletes have to be really careful about what they say and how they act

00:54:28.000 --> 00:54:38.000
which you shouldn't have to be like that but that's, that's how it is globally so we have to think about we're really fortunate to be in society where we do have that freedom, but we don't.

00:54:38.000 --> 00:54:59.000
On the other hand, we don't want to fall into that consumerism trap of saying that our young girls are got to be kind and touchy feely whereas our young boys aren't allowed to do that they aren't allowed to cry because it's, it's not, it's not manly.

00:54:59.000 --> 00:55:06.000
So, we need to be thinking about what we're doing as well in a Western society not to fall into that trap.

00:55:06.000 --> 00:55:19.000
Okay. Now let me see if there's anything else that's coming a little bit later. No, I think we've got through most things. We've got lots and lots of comments for you.

00:55:19.000 --> 00:55:38.000
And not just with our family bakers or I'd love to do research on family bakers because I'd have to try all the cakes as well you see. Yeah, I did a PhD for seven years, eating a lot of cases to taste them also with the pink cake tastes different to blue

00:55:38.000 --> 00:55:44.000
cake. Yeah that's quite it's quite an interesting point that Norman's making there listen to it. Yeah.

00:55:44.000 --> 00:55:53.000
Yeah, they are they are gender but wouldn't that be the case of, if you are asking a baker to create a cake for your daughter's birthday you would tell them what colors you want.

00:55:53.000 --> 00:56:05.000
And when you go to the supermarket you wouldn't buy one that's got pink on me by something that's not clear chocolate covered so so it's up to you in that sense of what you asked the baker to create for you.

00:56:05.000 --> 00:56:10.000
Yeah, might be useful for it for research though.

00:56:10.000 --> 00:56:11.000
Yeah.

00:56:11.000 --> 00:56:17.000
And. Okay, let's have a look just to see.

00:56:17.000 --> 00:56:20.000
Yeah, this is an interesting comment from.

00:56:20.000 --> 00:56:30.000
And when children are in school the opinions of siblings affect children and probably feel comfortable with an interesting point.

00:56:30.000 --> 00:56:38.000
I think that I suppose their peers as well. Yes, that's a good point about schools because a school uniform.

00:56:38.000 --> 00:56:45.000
It has changed a bit over the last few years but it's still very much in terms of that binary.

00:56:45.000 --> 00:57:01.000
The boys for example won't be encouraged to wear skirts to school, and the young girls can wear skirts and, and they can wear trousers, but the boys aren't allowed to wear skirts, and there was a case I think it was last year, the year before, where some

00:57:01.000 --> 00:57:12.000
of the boys in the high school came into school and in dresses and skirts Didn't they, they were told to go home and change

00:57:12.000 --> 00:57:19.000
schools is a p kids. If you notice that the P kids, boys and girls that don't wear the same.

00:57:19.000 --> 00:57:30.000
And also, in terms of what activities they do in PE, you'll notice in in high schools in primary schools are basically the same activities in high school.

00:57:30.000 --> 00:57:39.000
It's still the fact that girls will be doing that ball trampolining, and then boys will be doing football rugby.

00:57:39.000 --> 00:57:44.000
And then if girls want to do football they can be as an extra curricular activity.

00:57:44.000 --> 00:58:02.000
Yeah. And another interesting point here actually. And obviously quite relevant to myself, and Scotland we have men and kilts. So, yeah, So that's another reason why because we have Scott says no reason why men can't wear skirts,

00:58:02.000 --> 00:58:15.000
but they don't, you don't see many men wearing skirts because it's not accepted so socially it's not accepted if you wear a kilt but when you go to wedding so that's accepted.

00:58:15.000 --> 00:58:17.000
But otherwise it wouldn't be.