0:00
a hundred years later a German astronomer called vessel Friedrich
0:05
Berlin vessel had a much more superior much more advanced telescope with far far better engineering he repeated
0:11
Bradley's measurements and he came to the conclusion that yes the stars are indeed very very far away the one that
0:17
he studied in the constellation Draco the dragon was about nine point eight light-years away which doesn't actually
0:23
differ that much from the modern value that we've come to lore and expect and you thought it was a long way down to
0:29
the paper shop now alight here is the distance a beam of light can travel in a
0:35
year and if you think that the Sun and the earth are ninety eight million miles
0:40
away from each other separated by a gap of 98 million miles and it takes light eight and a half
0:47
minutes eight and a half minutes to get from the Sun to the earth you can
0:52
imagine how far a beam of light can travel in a year so the star that fruit
0:58
Bessel was looking at was nine point eight light years away in other words a long long way away far further away than
1:04
they actually expected to actually surprise vessel quite a lot so one thing
1:09
that we now know is that the stars are very very distant there are also very very dim which means that they're very
1:15
very difficult to spot so how do you go about finding an exoplanet around a distant star well you have to use some
1:22
trickery we have to use some knowledge of how planets move and how stars move to sort of fool nature into giving us a
1:29
treat and we have to use this phenomenon of the planets make stars wobble so if
1:36
we look at the position of a Sun in our solar system over a long period of time we notice the Sun wobbles it wobbles
1:45
around a common center of gravity that it shares with the other big planets the
1:51
earth doesn't make much of difference but big planets like Jupiter and Saturn's certainly pull the Sun out of
1:57
position and we can determine measure that wobble very very carefully very
2:03
very precisely now the thing is if the Sun wobbles then saw must other start if
2:08
they've got planets around them certainly planets as big as Jupiter we should be able to spot the wobble quite
2:15
readily so how do we stop that but that wobble is in fact incredibly small we
2:23
can do it with modern techniques but 35 years ago that technique wasn't there instead we had to use a technique we
2:29
listen to them using radio waves now a radio telescope is it almost exactly the same as an optical telescope except you
2:36
don't look into it you listen to it if you listen to radio waves took my optical telescope you would look for
2:43
light light and radio waves are very very similar creatures you listen to
2:48
them using a radio telescope think of you a very much larger bigger the bigger version of your sky satellite dish
2:54
that's what it is okay and we're looking for a particular type of star called a neutron star or
3:01
more specifically a non quiet pulsar they make a lot of noise out there it's
3:06
this when a big star when a particularly big star reaches the end of its life it
3:13
explodes it goes bang in a most ferocious where be thankful that we have not been in the proximity of any large
3:19
supernova in the last thousand years I might have been a few other ones but that was still sufficiently far away
3:25
there's not a really concern most big supernovae include one in about the Middle Ages Tycho Brahe and also what
3:31
about the time of the Battle of Hastings which fought all the demise of King
3:37
Harald but these stars when they explored they leave behind them a small
3:42
very dense lump of matter called a neutron star why a neutron star what's a neutron star when the electrons
3:50
and protons which make up the star are suddenly compressed by that explosion it
3:56
pushes the two together so the electrons and the positive and the protons cancel
4:02
each other out they become electrically neutral they cancel each other so what you're left with is a big lump of
4:09
neutron material combining into neutrons neutron means electrically neutral it has no
4:16
residual charge it's very small it's very dense but we're
4:21
original star was spinning and by the principle called the conservation of
4:27
angular momentum that star that little neutron star has to be spinning at roughly the same speed it's exactly the
4:34
same analogy as when an ice skater speeds up and slows down so must the
4:40
star that angular energy had to go somewhere so neutron stars spin very
4:46
very rapidly indeed very very rapidly indeed likewise all of the magnetic
4:53
energy that was stored in that star that is also conserved and because they are
4:58
so dense because there generates such a huge magnetic field any matter that is
5:03
sucked and pulled into the poles of that neutron star gives off an enormous amount of radial wave energy and if the
5:12
poles of that neutron star just happened to sweep past earth and the do lots of
5:17
them do we hear them as a series of clicks click click click click ok some
5:27
of them are very slow but once a second twice a second that sort of thing others very very quickly indeed but are the
5:34
most circumstances that interval between clicks is very very precise great
5:40
wonderful and we can hear those clicks with a radio telescope now the famous
5:45
inventor Discoverer of radio Nikola Tesla he heard these clicks of
5:52
one of the radio receivers he was developing for the US government he pointed his telescope radio telescope at
5:58
space and he heard these clicks and he was utterly convinced that he was listening to aliens sending us
6:04
intelligent message intelligent conversation they were trying to contact us unfortunately Tesla was wrong a Betty
6:11
wish he hadn't gone to the New York Times and met such a bold statement because he wasn't actually wrong we now then or them to be these objects called
6:17
pole stars now if you think about when a police car comes speeding towards you
6:24
you hear the pitch long way off the pitch is quite little but as this police car passes you or an ambulance passes
6:30
you you hear the pitch gets slightly higher and as the ambulance recedes from you the pitch gets lower and we call
6:39
this the Doppler effect it's very well known it quite easily demonstrate that outside okay when we started looking at
6:46
some of these pulsars with very very precise radio telescopes and good solid precise equipment we started notice that
6:53
some of the pulses were not as regular as they should be in fact so what the pulse has seemed to speed up and then
7:00
slow down and this is the tell-tale signature that something is pulling that
7:06
neutron star and position it's not sitting stationary in space it is
7:11
actually moving back and forth so what we'd expect to see there was something pulling that neutron star out of spec
7:18
position we would expect this pulses to speed up as the neutron star comes towards us and then slow down as the
7:25
neutron star moves away from us and if we measure the full range as the pulses
7:32
get close together what we have one extreme of the neutron stars orbit we
7:38
then when we hear the Pulsar speed up a second time we have the second extreme which is the distant part of the pulsars
7:44
orbit and then we're back again we see this cycle repeating over and over again
7:49
in a limited number of pulsars and this is the tell-tale sign that something big
7:55
something is pulling that neutron star out of orbit and it's an exoplanet it's
8:01
another planet around a distant pulsar and the gap between those double where
8:08
the pulses get closer together that indicates it's a good suggestion of how long the exoplanet takes to orbit the
8:14
star so we've used an indirect method we can't see the exoplanet
8:19
but we know it's there because we can hear it and indeed back in 1990 a Polish astronomer Narada you've got to try and
8:25
pronounce that name we're studying a pulsar in the constellation Virgo and he
8:31
analyzed this data and in 1992 he was able to confirm that we had indeed found
8:36
a planet around distant star now there is nowhere that that distant star this pulsar could
8:42
support life so the search continued trying to find other planets around
8:47
other stars but continuing to look at this pulsar PSR b1 2 5 7 + 12 we
8:54
discovered that it didn't have just one exoplanet further analysis revealed that it had another tomb so there's three one
9:02
called poltergeist forbit or drog so these are all strange names - you put
9:07
definitely we've got not just one exoplanet but three so that's an indirect technique for finding life on
9:14
another planet officer as planet around a distant star another technique was suggested by Otto
9:20
Struve a German astronomer he suggested looking for something akin to dubbed the
9:25
Doppler effect Doppler spectroscopy or read your velocity shifts and it sounds
9:31
complicated and it is but I'm gonna have a quick go and explaining how it works we know what stars are made of thanks to
9:37
the work of our old friend Isaac Newton he did a very important convent experiment called experimental Cruces
9:43
and it's why Newton for one of many achievements wine even got his face on the back of a pound Millard for anybody
9:50
who's old enough to remember pound bullets many are what he realized what
9:56
Newton realized was that you could take a beam of white light pass it through a prism and break it into its component
10:03
colors we see this with the rainbow bring it into its component colors but
10:09
what Newton was able to do was you're able to take that
10:15
rainbow of colors and we combine them into white light and that gave him a
10:20
clue that we could use light from distant objects to analyze what they were made from a stop of all truth
10:27
forgive me for this little joke yes it would make some cool artwork for an album cover at some point in time in the
10:33
future yes I'll just skip past that rather bad joke it didn't get a laugh last time so don't know why I include
10:38
anyway we use a device for a prism spectrometer I'm not going to go into how the prism spectrometer works but if
10:44
you point prism spectrometer and a distant star we can put decompose that
10:49
star's light into its component elements we can tell what a star is made from by
10:56
looking at a pattern of lights that passes through the prism spectrometer if you were old enough to remember low
11:02
pressure sodium lamps when every time you went outside at night the light from around you is just as gorgeous sodium
11:09
yellow that's because sodium yellow lights if you got a low pressure sodium inside one of these lights outside at
11:15
night makes everything glow yellow they're almost extinct now they've been replaced by LEDs but at one point these
11:22
sodium yellow lamps were everywhere okay so we use this tempest there's technique
11:28
this prism spectrometer analyzed the light coming from a distance star and those light measurements that we get
11:36
with those bars and stripes the colors that we see I'm very very the correspond very precisely to certain wavelengths so
11:42
if we see this pattern in the atmosphere of a distant star we know that sodium is there and every one of the major
11:48
elements has got their own individual pattern so we can analyze the atmosphere
11:54
of a star we can tell what elements are in the atmosphere of That star now Struve had this idea that if you've got
12:02
a stationary star a star that is not moving and you take a spectroscopic image of That star you see a pattern of
12:09
dark and light planes corresponding to the elements in that planets outer atmosphere if we find a moving star we
12:16
notice that that pattern of bands of shadows of lines and shadows is
12:22
shifted to one end of the spectrum in this case that shifted to the red end hence the term red shift that you might
12:28
have heard we noticed that the big black line in the center there or shifted by a little bit and that gap there that gap
12:35
between the bands between the snare Cherie start and the moving star is a good indication of how fast that star is
12:42
moving so we can tell if the star is moving away from us or coming towards us shift is a good measure of how fast the
12:49
star is moving but what if the absorption lines shift back and forth
12:55
not by much but if those absorption lines shift back and forth then we have
13:00
a very precise measure and a suggestion that there may well be a planet in orbit
13:06
around that star and we use this technique it's been very effective at
13:11
finding distant planets around the world stars the size of that swing is a good
13:18
measure of how fast the planet is moving it's not the full story but it gives us
13:23
some part of the story and the first planet to be found in this technique was called Bellerophon it was christened
13:29
Bellerophon and is a special kind of star called a hot Jupiter in other words
13:34
it's a planet about the size of Jupiter that orbits very closely to its first
13:40
star and consequently pulls it out of position quite dramatically now if you
13:46
can imagine the distance to the planet Mercury that's what we call a relatively close to the host star some of these hot
13:53
Jupiters orbit the inside the orbit of mercury very very close indeed how they
13:58
stay there how they've managed to stay stable how they've evolved is a bit of a puzzle we don't have all of the answers
14:04
to that but we found a significant number of these hot Jupiters out there
14:09
they're easy to detect so that's probably why we found more of them but we can certainly find these hot Jupiters
14:16
out there in space they're not suitable for life they're too close into the host star but we're getting there
14:22
we're starting to find some other techniques the last technique that I'm going to cover about finding exoplanets
14:28
is another way and it's called the transit method now I don't mean that it's named after a Ford
14:34
Transit I've included this image system issues with anybody still out there in to take attention but what it means is
14:42
that if we study the light from a distant star and we measure that light
14:47
very very carefully indeed very very precisely we might not be able to see
14:53
the exoplanet as it orbits the star but we might be able to detect a dip in the
14:59
light coming from That star as that planet dips in front of the star so if
15:05
we got the star the planet is coming from the left moving towards the right as the planet moves in front of the
15:11
distant star we see a very slight drop and the amount of light coming from that
15:17
stone and as the planet exit the other side the light level recovers and we've got what we call a transit now we're
15:24
talking about tiny tiny tiny amounts of dips and the brightness overall
15:29
brightness of That star but if we measure it often enough if we repeat the
15:35
observations we start to discern some kind of a pattern and a significant
15:40
number of exoplanets have been friend through this method called the transit method indeed the Kepler space telescope
15:46
it was sent it's this that ten years ago with a great big mirror and a great big
15:52
camera is exactly the same camera as you might find in your iPhone or your Samsung device just a huge detector
15:58
specifically to look for my name changes and the brightness of stars it was
16:04
launched into space far away from Earth pointing at just one area of the Milky
16:10
Way not far from the constellation Cygnus in the Milky Way still we can still say
16:16
Cygnus if you know where to look it's the middle of the night at the moment but Kepler was focused on one particular area of the sky and it just simply sat
16:25
looking at that area of the sky for about five or six years and in that time
16:31
it was able to detect a significant number of exoplanets as plants around
16:36
distant stars four thousand of them 4,000 of these things so we've gone from
16:42
thinking that planets around distant stars were incredibly rare - now we know
16:48
that they're actually very very common indeed we can't see any of these planets directly but we can infer something
16:56
about them from the dynamics of their system we can even image some of them with spectroscopes and we can tell
17:03
what's going on within their atmospheres that's how good we're getting into looking for these things looking for
17:08
these astronomers have used Kepler to discover the first multiple planet system using this technique we even
17:14
found mr. Spock's whole planet from Star Trek and the star Epsilon Eridani which
17:20
features in Star Trek and is the home for mr. Spock has been discovered to have an exoplanet in orbit around it
17:27
it's not habitable so you can forget going out there to the Scott's if mr. Spock is there it's not the slightest
17:33
bit habitable but it shows how good we're getting at detecting the icing of
17:38
the cake of course comes with Kepler 19 when it discovers a solar system which is almost identical to our own rocky in
17:46
planets in the interior big gas giants on the exterior so show us that our
17:51
solar system is extremely common out there remember Kepler is only looking at one particular area of the sky but
17:59
Kepler turned up some really really interesting results this star a strangely named kic 8 for 6 to 850 now
18:08
remember that number cuz I'll be asking questions later on otherwise known as tabby star
18:13
Kepler pointed at this star saw some unusual light patterns they made the
18:19
public announcement that they found something unusual around this star and of course it was picked up by all of tabloids who immediately announced the
18:26
destroyer must have discovered an alien mega-structure around this star breathe a sigh of
18:32
relief and smile because that's not what happened some of the artists impressions that began to spring up we're really
18:38
quite fanciful and we have no basis whatsoever to imagine that these alien mega structures are out there just don't
18:46
please don't imagine that that's what's going on it's not the case what we did we straightaway we sent radio telescopes
18:52
around world to listen to this star tabi star after the lady who discovered it did so
18:58
much for the early investigative work and we looked at this star through a radio telescope of a period of weeks and
19:04
we saw no activity whatsoever that might suggest alien life so sorry to
19:10
disappoint you we have not yet found et the most likely explanation that we've got is that there is an only even dust
19:17
ring around that star and exactly the same way is that we have an uneven dust
19:22
ring around our Sun we have two uneven dust rings around us on the asteroid
19:28
building not and the Kuiper belt which is the very edge of the solar system so tubby star is exactly like ours on
19:35
our solar system it's not massively unusual 2018 the Kepler space telescope
19:41
had to be retired it ran out of fuel it was unable to keep its men in Merritt and its optics cool it also run into
19:47
problems of trying to keep it stable so we could point it in the right place so it was gracefully retired and it is
19:53
still out there in space so if you fancy claiming the salvage rights off you go I
19:59
want to talk about now some of the state-of-the-art techniques that we've developed since Kepler was put into
20:04
space for finding exoplanets and we've been incredibly successful at finding planets around distant stars the Gaia
20:12
satellite was launched some years ago it's using a variation on Bradley's technique called a stroma tree to
20:19
measure the Stars and the positions of stars very very accurately and trying to determine if they're a wobble or not and
20:27
it has been very successful at finding stars that wobble we can use a technique
20:32
called occlusion where we put an object between a star and our eye it's a very
20:40
simple technique and we can use it to see details that would normally be
20:45
invisible to us for instance if we look at the star called formal hot it's an
20:51
old Arabic name for star that's been it's in the Southern Miss or some part of the sky it's not too easy to see from
20:57
this particular part from absurdly for my latitude those of you further south might fare better but if we use this occlusion
21:03
technique we could start to detect like a dust ring around formal hot we can detect exoplanets former Lord beef
21:11
in fact we now believe that former Lord bee has been struck violently by another
21:17
object in that star solar system in that solar system and is currently disintegrating when we first
21:23
photographed former Lord bee in 2004 it seemed to be a bright point of light but
21:29
ever since then we've noticed that it's getting bigger and bigger and more spread out and the implication is that
21:34
it has been struck and is disintegrating so this technique is very very positive there's another technique called a
21:41
vortex coronagraph I don't intend to explain it to you but it's another way of removing the central star from our
21:48
field of view and if we remove that star's light from a field of view we can see exoplanets directly now when I was
21:55
at university 40 odd years ago it's my tutor Jarek McCartan said we would never
22:01
ever be able to do this you should never ever say that to a bunch of physicists because they will go out there and prove
22:06
you wrong but we've started to see exoplanets out in space nearly everywhere we look exoplanets are the
22:13
norm rather than the exception we're getting better and better of processing signals from outer space we can use this
22:21
enhance signal processing technology to really get a good look at what stars and
22:27
what planets are made of we can determine elements in a star's outer
22:32
atmosphere and with any of the at within any of the extra planets in orbit around that stuff we can get a good handle on
22:38
what's there and what they're made of and what's in their upper atmosphere like things water and oxygen and methane
22:45
and that's what we've done we've istana detect these critical elements that are essential building blocks for life out
22:51
there in space April 2018 we launched the successor to
22:56
Kepler the transiting exoplanet survey system otherwise known as Tess Tess was
23:02
extremely effective within the first few months of its launch going into the right orbit it started to find
23:08
exoplanets as well so more and more evidence is building that stars have planets there the norm rather than the
23:16
we stopped long ago we found the first EXO moon the moon orbiting a distant
23:22
planet around a distant star it goes to show how clever we are as a bunch of
23:27
people little astronomers were very getting very good at finding close detail but less and nurses let's look at
23:34
them the analysis of the space telescope what Kepler actually showed us let's talk about some of the actual numbers
23:40
Kepler gave us a clue and it goes like this we think there is minus 40 billion
23:46
rocky earth-sized exoplanet swith in the Milky Way 40 billion and of that 40 billion
23:53
about 11 billion of those planets are found in the habitable zones around
23:58
sun-like stars so those 11 billion planets that are almost the same conditions in their solar systems that
24:05
we find earth in and those would be good candidates for finding life wouldn't we
24:11
expect to find life wouldn't we have started to see life out there in space by now and yet we see nothing
24:19
the skies are completely silent we hear nothing we've tried sending a message in
24:26
a bottle with Pioneer 10 with its little plaque stapled to the side pioneer 10 is moving extremely slowly
24:32
it's not like the Starship Enterprise where you can cross vast distances very quickly pioneer 10 is positively
24:38
pedestrian left the solar system about 20 years ago or possibly dead but it's
24:44
moving very very slowly it will be millions of years before five pioneer ten reaches any kind of inhabited planet
24:51
we've tried to say hello we've tried to send messages out into space that we
24:57
think et might be able to one day interpret or intercept or cache we've
25:02
not had any kind of response to that message we've also tried listening listening and analyzing the search for
25:10
extraterrestrial intelligence has been running for a lot of years now they've
25:15
had an awful over there listening over to amateurs who can lesson use their home computers to sort of download vast
25:21
amounts of data and listen for any sign of et and thus far in 20 years not a
25:27
single message has been received we've had a few red herrings we've had a few possibilities but we've not heard
25:34
anything we think are some slight evidence but back in 1977 we received a
25:42
small message wasn't very long about 76 seconds it was called the Wow event dr.
25:48
Jerry ehman who was using the big years radio telescope big ears as its nickname
25:54
Ohio State University Ridge of telescope 15th of August 1977 was the letting the
25:59
radio telescope just sweep the sky more or less unattended and he came back the following morning check the printout and
26:05
he saw this rather characteristic message here and it says 6 eq u jf v and
26:13
that's an encoded way of hey we've got a signal there's something here it's
26:19
exactly the same the same characteristics as a carrier wave without a signal as if he would tend
26:26
into your favorite radio station like classic FM radio 4 and the presenter was
26:31
silent and that's what it was we think we were there was into something there
26:37
it's never happened before it's never happened since there were some theories
26:42
going around about a few years ago that this was a pair of comets in the sky that was somehow interfering with the
26:48
radio telescopes those two comments kept and back through the same region of the sky we weren't able to conclude that
26:55
they were the source of this WoW signal so perhaps we were contacted and we
27:00
missed it case is not proven we still don't have enough information but as of
27:06
today we still have no evidence of any kind that there is life on other words
27:12
why haven't we found et is et rare is ET
27:17
plentiful we use a technique developed by an astronomer called Frank Craig it's
27:23
a tool for estimating the number of alien species intelligent species that might be out there so called Drake
27:30
Equation it's complicated far more complicated that we can go into here but basically
27:35
what it tries to calculate is looking at the information that we've got putting it into equation and trying to
27:41
the number of civilizations that might be in our Milky Way and it's complicated
27:47
so I'm not gonna go into it right now but we're gonna plug in some numbers we're gonna say that perhaps birth is
27:52
rare and if the earth planets like the earth civilizations capable of radio
27:59
communication are extremely rare we plug those figures in the earth turns out
28:04
that the earth-like civilizations are almost undetectable very very difficult
28:11
to detect so we shouldn't see many of them but if we're a bit more optimistic and we plug numbers into that table my
28:17
numbers have curiously vanished from the table this is some kind of conspiracy if we're a bit more optimistic and we
28:23
change the length of times the civilizations release detectable signals the number of planets of a solar system
28:28
in the habitable zone the rate at which stars form that sort of thing we suddenly get this enormous number if we
28:36
are a bit more optimistic we should see more far more millions 14 million
28:43
possible civilizations at work in the Milky Way and yet we see none of them so
28:48
which model is right we believe the Drake is a good starting point it's a good position to start so hi haven't we
28:55
found et and this is a subject of another lecture the Fermi paradox say
29:00
okay the great Simon's it was developed as an off-the-cuff remark from a physicist Enrico Fermi who'd been
29:06
studying the principle the problem and he said my minimun if you're going to predict that we've got 14 millions
29:12
civilizations that nowhere can't we see them why aren't we we should see something maybe we're not recognizing
29:20
that particular form of life is a living organism maybe it's the kind of life that we don't not we don't see maybe
29:26
it's some kind of machine intelligence remember we haven't found et because we
29:31
don't have their technology we don't have the technology to build great big
29:36
great big structures out there in space many faster-than-light signaling is not possible or it is possible we just can't
29:44
do it yet we're not able to read signals from ET because we certainly haven't got there yet
29:50
maybe one theory is that we live in a huge zoo that we have been quarantined
29:55
off from the rest of the universe because we are such a bunch of awful by barbarians
30:01
maybe the communications between eighty and these fellows are deliberately disguised so those without the mats
30:08
those without the smarts or the technology can't understand them it's kind of like a press sport you have to
30:15
have the technology to be able to figure out what's going on okay so this leads us into the next question
30:22
this is the really interesting bit this is where it really starts to get interesting because there were a number of scientists around the world now that
30:29
think we are only pretty much on our doorstep of finding life evidence strong
30:36
evidence powerful evidence of life on other planets we're going to do it with
30:41
bio signatures and technical signatures that goes like this a hundred years ago it was a great but debate in astronomy
30:47
about the scale of the universe and to commemorate back to bed 100 years later
30:53
mass are organized as simple as iam online so that we're obeying social distancing rules between all of these
30:59
experts in the field and ask them to contribute some kind of a pair for some kind of discussion as to where we think
31:05
we might find life because we've pretty sure we're gonna find it a lot of
31:12
theories a lot of good money is on finding bio signatures from the interior of icy moons probably around the
31:18
europoor on Jupiter and solidus around Saturn we've already detected some unusual compounds in the interior of
31:26
these icy moons we've done it with space probes we can see these space probes blasting material out into space we
31:33
measured what's there and we figured out that there's something going on within Europa with interns and sella desks that
31:40
makes it all the more intriguing bio signatures on the surface of Mars the
31:45
little Curiosity rover I said little it's about the size of a Range Rover and it's also nuclear-powered as well as discovered
31:53
all of them are many of the basic building blocks for life and we think
31:58
that quite probably lurking below the surface of Mars as yet undisclosed but there is microbial life left over
32:05
from wallet when Mars was a far more habitable planet at the moment Mars is completely uninhabitable for life like
32:12
us but we think just below the surface we might find life we've started digging
32:17
around underneath the surface as yet we found nothing but we found a lot of evidence that suggests there was running
32:23
water on Mars a million years ago or more the geology suggests that Mars was far
32:28
more habitable back then we started to find evidence but of what we call bio of
32:36
forming where biological organisms possibly have started modifying the
32:41
atmospheres of an exoplanet the evidence is rather slim but it is there we've
32:48
started detected gases that might come about from respiration and in some quantity as well so there's a suggestion
32:56
that we may well have life in some of these exoplanets and we're just on a
33:02
point right now of detecting it seth shostack the astronomer who set up the
33:07
search for extraterrestrial intelligence SETI claims and this is a rather bald
33:12
clam and I can't find any evidence to substantiate this he records that within the next 20 years we will find large
33:20
scale structures out there in the cosmos that are exactly analogous to the
33:25
pyramids that we see in Egypt these days your records that we'll find them and that will give us clear-cut evidence
33:31
that life is out there we're not alone but the Lord we still have no kind of
33:37
life any evidence of life over the words right now that might change if I come
33:44
back to you and say two years time until about the same lecture it might be entitled how we found life on other
33:49
planets but there's no evidence just yet but we come up with a tantalizing
33:54
possibility that maybe we've already been contacted maybe when we contacted as recently as the summer is 2017
34:01
because in 2017 an unusual object entered our solar system it was unusual
34:07
because if we traced its orbit back we discovered that this object called Oh
34:12
mwah mwah it's the name of a Hawaiian God I think
34:18
definitely didn't come from our solar system it came from another star entirely we've traced it we only saw is
34:25
it and as a long after it entered the our solar system we sort of caught up
34:31
with it as it was leaving the solar system and something strange happened as it left the solar system this long
34:38
cigar-shaped object about four thousand meters long and about three thousand meters of three 300 meters across very
34:45
long cigar-shaped tumbling through space it did something very unusual it started
34:51
to speed up and we have no good explanation why it would do that and a
34:57
number of astronomers notably IRA with very low but very well-known very well-respected astronomer said that there's all the characteristics of an
35:04
alien probe and those are others who are familiar with Star Trek we'll go yes we're familiar with this this looks very
35:11
much like an alien probe possibly maybe we've got evidence for et all along and
35:17
we just didn't know it was there we didn't know what to look for if you go
35:22
into the safe room the Carnegie observatories right under the Observatory South go down into there's a
35:28
door mark this door must be kept kept closed at all times if we go through all
35:33
of their archives if we look in these drawers which contain photographs of spectrograms
35:38
taken over a hundred years ago we look at this spectrogram taken October the
35:44
24th 1917 if we look at the spectrum of
35:49
this star and we look at it very very closely we see a double dip in the
35:55
spectrogram remember the dark lines I was talking about this is a negative we see a double dip where there should be
36:01
not we have no good explanation for this this double dip so-called vampire teeth
36:07
here unless there is a planet around that this is stuff so many all of the
36:12
evidence for exoplanets has been lurking in our drawer in a drawer some use
36:18
that's all for me to say it's been lurking in cupboards for a hundred years and we didn't know it was there and
36:23
maybe we just have to go back through the archives and have another look to see what's going on there are teams of astronomers now going through archives
36:30
look exactly this kind of data so the last question is to sum up before a finish is
36:37
we found distance stars with planets in the right orbit we found planets that
36:42
are capable of hosting life we found the basic building blocks of life on planets like Mars I've every
36:49
reason to expect that we'll find it on moons of set of maybe tighten around Saturn and under the oceans of Enceladus
36:56
and Europa will find building blocks of life to there as well so I think it's a
37:02
case that the evidence free team may have been there all along and maybe
37:07
we've already been contacted but maybe we are alone after all and it's a
37:12
sobering thought to stand out on the stars under the stars late on a cold crisp money too much light last night
37:18
look up and think Hammerman what if we are alone how does that make you feel if
37:24
we are alone it's a bit scary really perhaps we should say look slightly more care of the planet and of ourselves and
37:32
that our own kith and kin I'll leave you with that thought because that is all I
37:37
have to say 45 minutes not bad going right questions get a drink of water and
37:48
answer the questions rights to those that have questions on so I will put
37:54
them to david on your behalf so patricia Powell had the first question are all the exoplanets in the Goldilocks zone or
38:01
are they further out we have a fair number of planets in the Goldilocks zone
38:06
there seems to be a good solid distribution more of the hot Jupiters we're finding more hot Jupiters because
38:11
they are easy to find because they all been closed in because they disturb the planet the Sun the star quite a lot more
38:20
they are easier to spot not all of the planets are in the Goldilocks zone some
38:26
are a long way out so a very long way out some are very close in is comparatively few though we have found
38:33
that are in the Goldilocks zone but it is still a significant number in that particular zone so there are all the
38:38
Goldilocks zone they're spread out over some considerable distance there Thank You Sula harpies asked formal
38:45
hooked dust drink center not at the star because of the planet or because of a
38:50
near object it's just the way we photographed it the dust ring it's
38:56
possibly or it's just the way it's it's slightly angled to us if you it's the
39:02
effect of perspective in that particular image yes so it it looks slightly offset you're not looking at it straight on you
39:09
were looking at it from an angle because the just the dust lanes all bit in one
39:14
particular plane around the solar system if you look at all of the planets in our solar system all but in something we
39:21
call the ecliptic that's the path of the zodiac where your astrological constellations come from all of the
39:26
planets move in that particular pattern it's exactly analogous on formal horse where the planets and the dust ring all
39:33
sort of sitting in one particular plane called the plan of the plan of that particular solar system so what's
39:39
happening is that we're looking from a slightly oblique angle so that's why it looks slightly off to one side okay
39:46
thank you Richard Bayly Gibson's asking Brian Cooke seem to suggest that the chances
39:51
of the right conditions for life when a planet was extraordinary as so many things had to be right what do you think
39:57
he's exactly right he's very right but I
40:02
would go so far as to say that Earth evolved life on Earth evolved so it is
40:08
very likely you can't just turn around and say if there is one planet out there in the universe because statistics
40:14
doesn't work like that it is a very unlikely I would say but we have the statistics of numbers on our
40:20
side because bear in mind that we found 40 billion stars in the solar system and the Milky Way are capable of hosting
40:27
rocky planets so we are one in 40 billion one in 40 billion seems a very
40:34
very small number you better remember that Milky Way is a big place so there
40:40
may be life on us distant solar system that's on the other side of the Milky Way maybe some considerable distance off
40:48
we may well take a million years billion years to even know that each other is there
40:53
so I am more optimistic than mr. Cox professor Cox I am much more optimistic
41:00
but he's got better haircut than me so Paul Bowles is asking how can we detect
41:06
which exoplanets are most likely to support life their orbit the so-called
41:12
Goldilocks zone every star has its own particular Goldilocks zone we are
41:18
sitting exactly in the Goldilocks zone for our Sun it is exactly the right
41:23
balance based on the temperature the amount of energy that that star gives off the other conditions whether the
41:32
star is old enough whether the star is giving it a stable our Sun is
41:38
particularly stable and has been for a number of million years billion years so all of these conditions combine to
41:44
create what we call the Goldilocks or around each particular star it's different for other safe Prince's
41:51
Proxima Centauri has it's already gone Goldilocks zone but it's a it's a very
41:57
different system to our own that's nothing like we think there might be a planet but we know there's a planet
42:02
around Proxima Centauri but whether or not that star is capable of providing the right kind of conditions for life to
42:09
evolve at the moment we don't think it is so each Goldilocks zone varies according
42:15
to the stars temperature and its age under the prevailing conditions like how much junk there is left flying around in
42:22
the solar system after it formed because we're in a very stable safe period in our solar system most of the biggest of
42:29
the nasty stuff is being swept up by Jupiter right duncan McNeil's asking are
42:38
we assuming that life on exoplanets will have to be identical to us all the old Star Trek the idea that everybody is
42:46
very much the same you only have to look at the diversity of life on earth to
42:53
figure out that if we find exoplanets we life on an exoplanet we're gonna have to adjust our we are looking at what we
43:01
call life for instance look at the top the black sea Angela should look it's as simple as as simple as a cuttlefish I was studying
43:08
a cuttlefish at our local aquarium about four or five months ago now strange how
43:14
the time moves on but it demonstrated all of the signs of being intelligent certainly signalling communication
43:20
passing messages looking after it's you all that sort of things so maybe life on another planet could look like a
43:26
cuttlefish RS Darcy angel or remote possibility that it might look a lot
43:33
like us but we have so many different forms of life on the planet the birds for instance reptiles left
43:39
over from the dinosaur era we've still got fish a lot of the flea aquatic mammals for instance live in the
43:46
sea and are very intelligent we've got insects insect-like may one
43:51
day take over if we become extinct and stop killing the bees you know there might they might take over
43:58
final question there's a quick one from Linda's all killed actually it's an or is M do you know I'm just saying to find
44:06
it and they've got a branch astronomer in the Grimsby branch called Paul money she's just asking if you know him I
44:12
don't know him but I've seen his work all over the place we have a weather
44:17
forecaster called Paul money Paul Mooney boulogne he works for BBC local Tim Reid
44:23
he's the weather guy and I met him a few times and we got of two muddled up frequently very familiar with all right
44:37
final question why have we not found cities on other planets because we have
44:43
found life probably we've not found any
44:49
artifacts now remember szostak you try saying that with it Seth Shostak he thinks I'm not sure he
44:58
gets this information from that we will find something like say the remains of the pyramids on another planet we might
45:05
find some artifact left over from a previous civilization great that's marvelous that means the acquired intelligence
45:11
they maybe didn't acquire the ability to send radio communications or voyage into space but a
45:18
that they were able to build structures and have some kind of civilization that's very very promising that would be
45:24
absolutely brilliant there's such a bald thing for mr. shutter stack to actually say that it makes me wonder has he got
45:31
something under his belt that he's not telling us have they actually found something are some sign that they're
45:37
keeping quiet you know sometimes take a long time to if I
45:43
scientist find something and then they need to find a lot of evidence to corroborate those findings and then
45:48
those findings have to be peer-reviewed so you might get a discovery that's announced but then it's it appears on
45:55
archived org or something like that but it then disappears for a long time before it's discounted maybe we don't
46:02
know but at the moment we have not found anything hard physical that would show
46:09
that there is some kind of intelligence civilization had existed on a distant planet there is some technology being
46:15
developed now called the hyper telescope is a fantastically powerful tool the
46:22
telescopes on the ground are limited by the atmosphere so we send space telescopes into space they are limited
46:28
by the size of their mirrors and the idea with the hyper telescope is proposed by a French inventor is that
46:35
you make two telescope mirrors and you put them a hundred miles apart that will
46:40
give you the resolving power of a telescope that is 100 miles across but it would have the light gathering
46:47
capabilities it'll just have the resolving power and this French astronomer whose name escapes me at the
46:52
moment wish I'd written it down claims that if we use this technology if we developed the hyper telescope to its
46:58
logical extreme we might be able to see structures on distant exoplanets we
47:05
might be able to see cities that is a fantastic possibility that's where this
47:10
technology is going us where our own technologies like the ability to see that far away as tantalizing and it's
47:17
real technologies it's going to happen within 10 or 20 years so long live the
47:22
Hubble telescope David thank you again that they've comments that we're coming through as brilliant I'm just going to
47:29
launch the pool well I thank you saw if those are still on the coke and and how you can give us some feedback we can
47:36
obviously feed that back to David but thank you again David for coming on disability I know you're coming back
47:42
again aren't years a couple of weeks time I think so yes I hope so yes for
47:48
myself but yes so David will be coming
47:55
back and as usual just a plug this is part of your member benefits we're really delighted that we've got people
48:02
the caliber of David that are coming on to give us a range of different talks on different subjects so please em you guys
48:10
that are on are using the benefit please talk about it till friends relatives colleagues about the membership benefit
48:16
and we will continue to get people late David on to talk to you about a variety of different topics a quick reminder for
48:23
those that are on that we've got a couple of sessions next Wednesday on the 13th and 1:00 in the morning with team
48:30
Carol black in conversation with Simon Parkinson and then in the afternoon we've got a session with council trustee
48:38
and representatives and the leadership team and you can ask them whatever you want so please feel free to register for
48:45
both of them sign up I am signed up to register it's exactly as you've done for
48:50
today and we look forward to seeing you on Wednesday David thanks so much again and I will see you in a couple of weeks
48:57
okay a couple of weeks thank you very much thank you
49:12
ng yeah I'm here I can't I can't take
49:20
part in the poll for some reason is that cuz you're the coolest is that can I
49:27
only take Oh cuz I am but I just it's the first time normally I do it I can't let mute I can't I can't get my
49:37
mouse back well I'll stop your sheet and screen there D bet oh okay right that's
49:45
fine thank you thanks again that was great it's a pleasure right I'm gonna write
49:51
that's me done what do we got here what we got oh poor and then registered right that's the lecture start time that's not
49:57
my fault yeah we've-- goodness it's not your your stuffs great is the lecture start saying much I think we're gonna we're going to
50:03
have a review of okay all right take care then T but I'll just end the
50:09
meeting